These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24113147)

  • 21. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.
    Scott I; Greenberg P; Poole P; Campbell D
    Intern Med J; 2006 Sep; 36(9):587-99. PubMed ID: 16911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence-based decision-making 2: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Bello A; Wiebe N; Garg A; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():397-416. PubMed ID: 25694324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions.
    Dobbins M; Cockerill R; Barnsley J; Ciliska D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 11758291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Understanding statistical terms. 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Aug; 47(8):95-6. PubMed ID: 19654420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Menzies D
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 May; 15(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 21756509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews.
    McIntosh HM; Woolacott NF; Bagnall AM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Jul; 4():19. PubMed ID: 15260887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Infections in hematogical cancer patients: the contribution of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Paul M; Gafter-Gvili A; Goldberg E; Yahav D
    Acta Haematol; 2011; 125(1-2):80-90. PubMed ID: 21150190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
    Anderson R
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 19378354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pitfalls in meta-analyses on adverse events reported from clinical trials.
    Huang HY; Andrews E; Jones J; Skovron ML; Tilson H
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Oct; 20(10):1014-20. PubMed ID: 21858897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Askie L; Offringa M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 26515266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.