These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24114064)

  • 1. Oval and round window vibroplasty: a comparison of hearing results, risks and failures.
    Canale A; Dagna F; Cassandro C; Giordano P; Caranzano F; Lacilla M; Albera R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 271(10):2637-40. PubMed ID: 24114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.
    Kwak SH; Moon YM; Nam GS; Bae SH; Kim SH; Jung J; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E926-E932. PubMed ID: 31977072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Lassaletta L; Calvino M; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Pérez-Mora RM; Muñoz E; Gavilán J
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 25839978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window.
    Sprinzl GM; Schoerg P; Muck S; Jesenko M; Speiser S; Ploder M; Edlinger SH; Magele A
    Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window Vibroplasty with tympanosclerosis.
    Iwasaki S; Suzuki H; Moteki H; Miyagawa M; Takumi Y; Usami S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 132(6):676-82. PubMed ID: 22385350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
    Beltrame AM; Todt I; Sprinzl G; Profant M; Schwab B
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM; Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Koci V
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Marino R; Lampacher P; Dittrich G; Tavora-Vieira D; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan GP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Round and Oval Window Anatomic Variability: Its Implication for the Vibroplasty Technique.
    Mancheño M; Aristegui M; Sañudo JR
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):e50-e57. PubMed ID: 28346291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M; Colletti L; Colletti V
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V; Mandalà M; Colletti L
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Round window vibroplasty: long-term results.
    Böheim K; Mlynski R; Lenarz T; Schlögel M; Hagen R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22779784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Vibrant soundbridge implantation of congenital atresia of oval window(with summary of nine cases].
    Wang DN; Zhao SQ; Li Y; Ma XB; Ren R; Chen XQ; Li YL
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 31(8):588-589. PubMed ID: 29871320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Round window application of an active middle ear implant (AMEI) system in congenital oval window atresia.
    Zhao S; Gong S; Han D; Zhang H; Ma X; Li Y; Chen X; Ren R; Li Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016; 136(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26493073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.