BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24114187)

  • 1. Functional imaging to predict tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Barwick TD; Taylor A; Rockall A
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2013 Dec; 15(6):549-58. PubMed ID: 24114187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.
    Miccò M; Vargas HA; Burger IA; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 24767630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.
    Pandharipande PV; Choy G; del Carmen MG; Gazelle GS; Russell AH; Lee SI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):802-14. PubMed ID: 19234280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complementary Prognostic Value of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Whole-Body Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Sala E; Micco M; Burger IA; Yakar D; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1461-7. PubMed ID: 26397068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
    Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography and treated with curative intent.
    Narayan K; Fisher RJ; Bernshaw D; Shakher R; Hicks RJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jul; 19(5):912-8. PubMed ID: 19574784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.
    Salib MY; Russell JHB; Stewart VR; Sudderuddin SA; Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Bharwani N
    Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 32946322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-treatment prediction of early response to chemoradiotherapy by quantitative analysis of baseline staging FDG-PET/CT and MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Min LA; Ackermans LL; Nowee ME; Griethuysen JJV; Roberti S; Maas M; Vogel WV; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):940-948. PubMed ID: 32722967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of outcome using pretreatment
    Lucia F; Visvikis D; Desseroit MC; Miranda O; Malhaire JP; Robin P; Pradier O; Hatt M; Schick U
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):768-786. PubMed ID: 29222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
    Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.
    Marnitz S; Tsunoda AT; Martus P; Vieira M; Affonso Junior RJ; Nunes J; Budach V; Hertel H; Mustea A; Sehouli J; Scharf JP; Ulrich U; Ebert A; Piwonski I; Kohler C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1855-1861. PubMed ID: 33293284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging during definitive chemoradiotherapy can predict tumor recurrence and patient survival in locally advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of KROG 16-01.
    Lee SW; Lee SH; Kim J; Kim YS; Yoon MS; Jeong S; Kim JH; Lee J; Eom KY; Jeong BK; Sung SY; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 147(2):334-339. PubMed ID: 28935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDG-PET Imaging in Cervical Cancer.
    Gandy N; Arshad MA; Park WE; Rockall AG; Barwick TD
    Semin Nucl Med; 2019 Nov; 49(6):461-470. PubMed ID: 31630730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pilot study of combined FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of locally advanced cervical carcinoma before and during concurrent chemoradiotherapy suggests association between changes in tumor blood volume and treatment response.
    Banks TI; von Eyben R; Hristov D; Kidd EA
    Cancer Med; 2018 Aug; 7(8):3642-3651. PubMed ID: 29963760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic values of ADC
    Akkus Yildirim B; Onal C; Erbay G; Cem Guler O; Karadeli E; Reyhan M; Koc Z
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 30354907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for posttherapy evaluation in patients with advanced cervical cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Su TP; Lin G; Huang YT; Liu FY; Wang CC; Chao A; Chou HH; Yen TC; Lai CH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):727-734. PubMed ID: 29159572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of magnetic resonance and ¹⁸FDG PET-CT in predicting tumor response and resectability of primary locally advanced cervical cancer after treatment with intensity-modulated arc therapy: a prospective pathology-matched study.
    Vandecasteele K; Delrue L; Lambert B; Makar A; Lambein K; Denys H; Tummers P; Van den Broecke R; Villeirs G; De Meerleer G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 22237382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging.
    Gouy S; Morice P; Narducci F; Uzan C; Martinez A; Rey A; Bentivegna E; Pautier P; Deandreis D; Querleu D; Haie-Meder C; Leblanc E
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(24):3026-33. PubMed ID: 23857967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
    Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
    Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.