These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24114226)
1. Effects of two variations of differential reinforcement on prompt dependency. Cividini-Motta C; Ahearn WH J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):640-50. PubMed ID: 24114226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of tangible and social reinforcers on skill acquisition, stereotyped behavior, and task engagement in three children with autism spectrum disorders. Kang S; O'Reilly M; Rojeski L; Blenden K; Xu Z; Davis T; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Feb; 34(2):739-44. PubMed ID: 23220050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism. Kocher CP; Howard MR; Fienup DM Behav Modif; 2015 Jul; 39(4):600-21. PubMed ID: 25896361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism. Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Karsten AM; Carr JE; Lepper TL Behav Modif; 2011 Jul; 35(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 21613240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers. Kelly MA; Roscoe EM; Hanley GP; Schlichenmeyer K J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of differential reinforcement procedures for learners with autism spectrum disorder. Johnson KA; Vladescu JC; Kodak T; Sidener TM J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):290-303. PubMed ID: 28101892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior. DeLeon IG; Neidert PL; Anders BM; Rodriguez-Catter V J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of rules on differential reinforcement of other behavior. Watts AC; Wilder DA; Gregory MK; Leon Y; Ditzian K J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 24114232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of response prompts for teaching behavior chains. Seaver JL; Bourret JC J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(4):777-92. PubMed ID: 25303181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing the saliency of behavior-consequence relations for children with autism who exhibit persistent errors. Fisher WW; Pawich TL; Dickes N; Paden AR; Toussaint K J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(4):738-48. PubMed ID: 25311794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference. Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased parent reinforcement of spontaneous requests in children with autism spectrum disorder: effects on problem behavior. Robertson RE; Wehby JH; King SM Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Mar; 34(3):1069-82. PubMed ID: 23299185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities. Heinicke MR; Carr JE; Eastridge D; Kupfer J; Mozzoni MP Brain Inj; 2013; 27(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 23252436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism. Karsten AM; Carr JE J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 19949520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment. Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changing preference from tangible to social activities through an observation procedure. Leaf JB; Oppenheim-Leaf ML; Townley-Cochran D; Leaf JA; Alcalay A; Milne C; Kassardjian A; Tsuji K; Dale S; Leaf R; Taubman M; McEachin J J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 26660202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of differential reinforcement to reduce behavior problems in adults with intellectual disabilities: a methodological review. Chowdhury M; Benson BA Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 21176869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]