BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24114870)

  • 1. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Balkany TJ; Whitley M; Shapira Y; Angeli SI; Brown K; Eter E; Van De Water T; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Treaba C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 19730145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simplified fixation of the new thin cochlear implant receiver-stimulators in children: long term results with the "back-pocket" technique.
    Cuda D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1158-61. PubMed ID: 23707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Device fixation in cochlear implantation: is bone anchoring necessary?
    Molony TB; Giles JE; Thompson TL; ; Motamedi KK
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Sep; 120(9):1837-9. PubMed ID: 20602458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Güldiken Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):916-8. PubMed ID: 26314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracranial complications of cochlear implantation.
    Dodson KM; Maiberger PG; Sismanis A
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 17414094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children.
    Cohen MS; Ha AY; Kitsko DJ; Chi DH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Sep; 78(9):1545-7. PubMed ID: 25064628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Orhan KS; Yiğit O; Başaran B; Polat B; Güneş S; Acoğlu E; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 21725262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic Evidence of Cochlear Implant Bone Bed Formation Following the Subperiosteal Temporal Pocket Technique.
    Turanoglu AK; Yigit O; Acioglu E; Okbay AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Apr; 154(4):702-6. PubMed ID: 26884370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rates of revision and device failure in cochlear implant surgery: a 30-year experience.
    Wang JT; Wang AY; Psarros C; Da Cruz M
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Oct; 124(10):2393-9. PubMed ID: 24550135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implant fixation in children using periosteal sutures.
    Adunka OF; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 17577130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal access and standard cochlear implantation: a comparative study.
    Prager JD; Neidich MJ; Perkins JN; Meinzen-Derr J; Greinwald JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 76(8):1102-6. PubMed ID: 22595461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
    Markodimitraki LM; Harkel TCT; Bennink E; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):605. PubMed ID: 37743463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
    Foyt D; Carfrae M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients.
    Guevara N; Sterkers O; Bébéar JP; Meller R; Magnan J; Mosnier I; Amstutz I; Lerosey Y; Triglia JM; Roman S; Gahide I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):501-5. PubMed ID: 20860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical technique for implantation of the MED-EL SONATATI.
    Stark T; Niedermeyer HP; Knopf A; Sudhoff H
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 21701245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-incision for pediatric cochlear implantation with a MED-EL device.
    Bayazit YA; Goksu N; Ozbilen S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 17713358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.