208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24115150)
41. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department.
de Vocht F; van Drooge H; Engels H; Kromhout H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 23(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 16374876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Analysis, comparison and representation of occupational exposure to a static magnetic field in a 3-T MRI site.
Hartwig V; Biagini C; De Marchi D; Flori A; Gabellieri C; Virgili G; Ferrante Vero LF; Landini L; Vanello N; Giovannetti G
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Mar; 28(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 32276568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields.
Bracken TD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Apr; 54(4):165-77. PubMed ID: 8480632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Numerical field evaluation of healthcare workers when bending towards high-field MRI magnets.
Wang H; Trakic A; Liu F; Crozier S
Magn Reson Med; 2008 Feb; 59(2):410-22. PubMed ID: 18228572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Hygienic characteristics of occupation for medical personnel working with magnetic resonance tomographs].
Mokoian BO
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (3):34-6. PubMed ID: 22702134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Health effects of static magnetic fields--a review of the epidemiological evidence.
Feychting M
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):241-6. PubMed ID: 15556662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Exposure to static magnetic fields and risk of accidents among a cohort of workers from a medical imaging device manufacturing facility.
Bongers S; Slottje P; Portengen L; Kromhout H
Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26079378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Work-related factors associated with occupational exposure to static magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners.
Schaap K; Christopher-De Vries Y; Cambron-Goulet É; Kromhout H
Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):2141-55. PubMed ID: 26096360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Women are more strongly affected by dizziness in static magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imaging scanners.
Heinrich A; Szostek A; Meyer P; Reinhard I; Gilles M; Paslakis G; Rauschenberg J; Gröbner J; Semmler W; Deuschle M; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Flor H; Nees F
Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(14):1081-4. PubMed ID: 25089803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of occupational exposure to static magnetic field in MRI sites based on body pose estimation and SMF analytical computation.
Belguerras L; Kadkhodamohammadi AR; Delmas A; Miralipoor M; Weber N; Gangi A; Felblinger J; Padoy N; Pasquier C
Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Oct; 39(7):503-515. PubMed ID: 30307039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Engineering for safety assurance in MRI: analytical, numerical and experimental dosimetry.
Hartwig V
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jun; 33(5):681-9. PubMed ID: 25660641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Health complaints among nurses working near MRI scanners--a descriptive pilot study.
Wilén J; de Vocht F
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 20950976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Procedure for Quantitative Characterization and Analysis of Magnetic Fields in Magnetic Resonance Sites for Protection of Workers: A Pilot Study.
Hartwig V; Biagini C; De Marchi D; Flori A; Gabellieri C; Virgili G; Ferrante Vero LF; Landini L; Vanello N; Giovannetti G
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Mar; 63(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30852618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Survey of risks related to static magnetic fields in ultra high field MRI].
Möller HE; von Cramon DY
Rofo; 2008 Apr; 180(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18370347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Physiologic and dosimetric considerations for limiting electric fields induced in the body by movement in a static magnetic field.
Jokela K; Saunders RD
Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):641-53. PubMed ID: 22004933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Occupational risk among magnetic resonance workers. Analysis of the literature].
Magnavita N; Fileni A
Radiol Med; 1995 May; 89(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 7617908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. EU Directive 2004/40: field measurements of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner.
Riches SF; Collins DJ; Scuffham JW; Leach MO
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):483-7. PubMed ID: 17684078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Subjective Symptoms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Personnel: A Multi-Center Study in Italy.
Bravo G; Modenese A; Arcangeli G; Bertoldi C; Camisa V; Corona G; Giglioli S; Ligabue G; Moccaldi R; Mucci N; Muscatello M; Venturelli I; Vimercati L; Zaffina S; Zanotti G; Gobba F
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():699675. PubMed ID: 34692618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Unexpected pacing inhibition upon exposure to the 3T static magnetic field prior to imaging acquisition: what is the mechanism?
Gimbel JR
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jun; 8(6):944-5. PubMed ID: 21199688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Multicenter study of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7 and 9.4 T.
Rauschenberg J; Nagel AM; Ladd SC; Theysohn JM; Ladd ME; Möller HE; Trampel R; Turner R; Pohmann R; Scheffler K; Brechmann A; Stadler J; Felder J; Shah NJ; Semmler W
Invest Radiol; 2014 May; 49(5):249-59. PubMed ID: 24637589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
