These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24115169)

  • 1. A penalized Bayesian approach to predicting sparse protein-DNA binding landscapes.
    Levinson M; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 24115169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
    Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ChIP-BIT: Bayesian inference of target genes using a novel joint probabilistic model of ChIP-seq profiles.
    Chen X; Jung JG; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Shih IeM; Wang Y; Magnani L; Wang TL; Xuan J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e65. PubMed ID: 26704972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) to analyze short reads generated by sequencing protein-DNA interactions in embryonic stem cells.
    Liu T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1150():81-95. PubMed ID: 24743991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting clustering and ordering binding patterns among transcription factors via point process models.
    Cha M; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 30(16):2263-71. PubMed ID: 24790155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MuMoD: a Bayesian approach to detect multiple modes of protein-DNA binding from genome-wide ChIP data.
    Narlikar L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jan; 41(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 23093591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of experimentally verified transcription factor binding sites models for computational analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Levitsky VG; Kulakovskiy IV; Ershov NI; Oshchepkov DY; Makeev VJ; Hodgman TC; Merkulova TI
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 24472686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq.
    Bailey TL; Machanick P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Sep; 40(17):e128. PubMed ID: 22610855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. De novo ChIP-seq analysis.
    He X; Cicek AE; Wang Y; Schulz MH; Le HS; Bar-Joseph Z
    Genome Biol; 2015 Sep; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 26400819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrative analysis identifies co-dependent gene expression regulation of BRG1 and CHD7 at distal regulatory sites in embryonic stem cells.
    Yang P; Oldfield A; Kim T; Yang A; Yang JYH; Ho JWK
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(13):1916-1920. PubMed ID: 28203701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discovering homotypic binding events at high spatial resolution.
    Guo Y; Papachristoudis G; Altshuler RC; Gerber GK; Jaakkola TS; Gifford DK; Mahony S
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Dec; 26(24):3028-34. PubMed ID: 20966006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CisMapper: predicting regulatory interactions from transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
    O'Connor T; Bodén M; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):e19. PubMed ID: 28204599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A transdimensional Bayesian model for pattern recognition in DNA sequences.
    Li SM; Wakefield J; Self S
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):668-85. PubMed ID: 18349034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SignalSpider: probabilistic pattern discovery on multiple normalized ChIP-Seq signal profiles.
    Wong KC; Li Y; Peng C; Zhang Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 25192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
    Nix DA; Courdy SJ; Boucher KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():523. PubMed ID: 19061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins.
    Kharchenko PV; Tolstorukov MY; Park PJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1351-9. PubMed ID: 19029915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
    Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.