These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24115397)

  • 1. Inter-provider comparison of patient-reported outcomes: developing an adjustment to account for differences in patient case mix.
    Nuttall D; Parkin D; Devlin N
    Health Econ; 2015 Jan; 24(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24115397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Models used for case-mix adjustment of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in musculoskeletal healthcare: A systematic review of the literature.
    Burgess R; Bishop A; Lewis M; Hill J
    Physiotherapy; 2019 Jun; 105(2):137-146. PubMed ID: 30591362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.
    Paddison C; Elliott M; Parker R; Staetsky L; Lyratzopoulos G; Campbell JL; Roland M
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 22626735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between patient-reported outcomes of elective surgery and hospital and consultant volume.
    Varagunam M; Hutchings A; Black N
    Med Care; 2015 Apr; 53(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 25654295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case-mix & patients' reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Comparison with NHS providers.
    Browne J; Jamieson L; Lewsey J; van der Meulen J; Copley L; Black N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Apr; 8():78. PubMed ID: 18400096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact on hospital performance of introducing routine patient reported outcome measures in surgery.
    Varagunam M; Hutchings A; Neuburger J; Black N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2014 Apr; 19(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 24072815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a risk-adjusted blood utilization metric.
    Stonemetz JL; Allen PX; Wasey J; Rivers RJ; Ness PM; Frank SM
    Transfusion; 2014 Oct; 54(10 Pt 2):2716-23. PubMed ID: 24611645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk adjustment methods for Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) based on the minimum data set for home care.
    Dalby DM; Hirdes JP; Fries BE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15656901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy.
    Nicholl J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Nov; 61(11):1010-3. PubMed ID: 17933961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Case-mix adjustment for diabetes indicators: a systematic review.
    Calsbeek H; Markhorst JG; Voerman GE; Braspenning JC
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e45-52. PubMed ID: 26881319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
    Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading: an annotated "pen and paper" approach to multidimensional case-mix-adjusted continuous quality improvement.
    Stineman MG; Charles J; Kurichi JE
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 20826414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-mix adjustment of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0: a violation of model assumptions?
    Elliott MN; Swartz R; Adams J; Spritzer KL; Hays RD
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):555-73. PubMed ID: 11482589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery.
    Black N; Varaganum M; Hutchings A
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jul; 23(7):534-42. PubMed ID: 24508681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deriving a risk-adjustment formula for hospital financing: integrating the impact of socio-economic status on length of stay.
    Perelman J; Shmueli A; Closon MC
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jan; 66(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 17888552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.
    Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting costs of care using a pharmacy-based measure risk adjustment in a veteran population.
    Sales AE; Liu CF; Sloan KL; Malkin J; Fishman PA; Rosen AK; Loveland S; Paul Nichol W; Suzuki NT; Perrin E; Sharp ND; Todd-Stenberg J
    Med Care; 2003 Jun; 41(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 12773841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HIV quality report cards: impact of case-mix adjustment and statistical methods.
    Ohl ME; Richardson KK; Goto M; Vaughan-Sarrazin M; Schweizer ML; Perencevich EN
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Oct; 59(8):1160-7. PubMed ID: 25034427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusting for case mix and social class in examining variation in home visits between practices.
    Sullivan CO; Omar RZ; Forrest CB; Majeed A
    Fam Pract; 2004 Aug; 21(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 15249522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.