These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24116317)

  • 1. Common errors in manuscripts submitted to medical science journals.
    Ezeala C; Nweke I; Ezeala M
    Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2013 Jul; 3(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 24116317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection Reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine.
    Menon V; Varadharajan N; Praharaj SK; Ameen S
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2022 Jan; 44(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 35509668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
    Bordage G
    Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advice to authors for avoiding flaws in preparation of original research manuscripts.
    Bhatt A
    Perspect Clin Res; 2021; 12(4):229-233. PubMed ID: 34760652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation get rejected?
    Yanık B; Evcik D; Geler Külcü D; Koldaş Doğan Ş; Bardak AN; Zateri C; Sonel Tur B
    Turk J Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 69(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 38766586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Major mistakes in scientific medical writing based on manuscripts' reviews.
    Melki S; Ben Hassine D; Chebil D; Zanina Y; Ben Saad H; Ben Abdelaziz A
    Tunis Med; 2024 Jan; 102(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 38545724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Writing biomedical manuscripts part I: fundamentals and general rules.
    Ohwovoriole AE
    West Afr J Med; 2011; 30(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 22120477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts.
    Stephen D
    Scientometrics; 2022; 127(6):3413-3435. PubMed ID: 35431366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
    Herber OR; Bradbury-Jones C; Böling S; Combes S; Hirt J; Koop Y; Nyhagen R; Veldhuizen JD; Taylor J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32423388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report.
    Barajas-Ochoa A; Cisneros-Barrios A; Ramos-Remus C
    Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2541-2551. PubMed ID: 35698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.