159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24116411)
1. Effect of temporal decay on perception of heavy-weight floor impact sounds.
Kim JH; Ryu JK; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2730-8. PubMed ID: 24116411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective evaluation of heavy-weight floor impact sounds in relation to spatial characteristics.
Jeon JY; Lee PJ; Kim JH; Yoo SY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):2987-94. PubMed ID: 19425642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined effect of noise and vibration produced by high-speed trains on annoyance in buildings.
Lee PJ; Griffin MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 23556582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positioning soundscape research and management.
Andringa TC; Weber M; Payne SR; Krijnders JD; Dixon MN; v d Linden R; de Kock EG; Lanser JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2739-47. PubMed ID: 24116412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced awakening probability of repetitive impulse sounds.
Vos J; Houben MM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2011-25. PubMed ID: 23967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
Galbrun L; Ali TT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises--implications for speech masking design.
Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 25786947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the standard rubber ball as an impact source with heavyweight concrete floors.
Jeon JY; Lee PJ; Sato S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):167-78. PubMed ID: 19603874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds.
Jeon JY; Lee PJ; You J; Kang J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1357-66. PubMed ID: 20329835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions.
Pelegrín-García D; Fuentes-Mendizábal O; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):228-38. PubMed ID: 21786893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of spectral overlap on the echo suppression threshold for single reflection conditions.
Walther A; Robinson P; Santala O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL158-64. PubMed ID: 23927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relating traffic, construction, and ventilation noise to cognitive performances and subjective perceptions.
Lee PJ; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2765-72. PubMed ID: 24116415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Echo thresholds for reflections from acoustically diffusive architectural surfaces.
Robinson PW; Walther A; Faller C; Braasch J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2755-64. PubMed ID: 24116414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
