These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24116428)

  • 61. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
    Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Determining the minimum number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately estimate pitch matches across the array.
    Stelmach J; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Aronoff JM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):894-899. PubMed ID: 28697658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Landsberger DM; Mertens G; Punte AK; Van De Heyning P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):EL75-81. PubMed ID: 25234918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Spatial and non-spatial multisensory cueing in unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Pavani F; Venturini M; Baruffaldi F; Artesini L; Bonfioli F; Frau GN; van Zoest W
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():24-37. PubMed ID: 27810286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Cortical Processing of Level Cues for Spatial Hearing is Impaired in Children with Prelingual Deafness Despite Early Bilateral Access to Sound.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):270-287. PubMed ID: 29119311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1448. PubMed ID: 31472555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.
    Won JH; Lorenzi C; Nie K; Li X; Jameyson EM; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1113-9. PubMed ID: 22894230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Lin P; Lu T; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):962-9. PubMed ID: 23363113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.
    Won JH; Jones GL; Drennan WR; Jameyson EM; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2088-97. PubMed ID: 21973363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.
    Duran SI; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3849-55. PubMed ID: 23231115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.
    Stahl P; Macherey O; Meunier S; Roman S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1578. PubMed ID: 27106306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Lateralization of interaural timing differences with multi-electrode stimulation in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Kan A; Jones HG; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):EL392. PubMed ID: 27908067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Erenberg SR; Taylor J; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3406-17. PubMed ID: 23145621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.