806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24117676)
1. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 24117676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronally advanced flap alone or with connective tissue graft in the treatment of single gingival recession defects: a long-term randomized clinical trial.
Kuis D; Sciran I; Lajnert V; Snjaric D; Prpic J; Pezelj-Ribaric S; Bosnjak A
J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1576-85. PubMed ID: 23432657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes.
Zuhr O; Akakpo D; Eickholz P; Vach K; Hürzeler MB; Petsos H;
J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jul; 48(7):949-961. PubMed ID: 33847022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.
Roman A; Soancă A; Kasaj A; Stratul SI
J Periodontal Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 23317049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft techniques for the treatment of deep gingival recession in the lower incisors. A controlled randomized clinical trial.
Zucchelli G; Marzadori M; Mounssif I; Mazzotti C; Stefanini M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Aug; 41(8):806-13. PubMed ID: 24802283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of inter-dental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cairo F; Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Nieri M; Mervelt J; Cincinelli S; Pini-Prato G
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):760-8. PubMed ID: 22639845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions.
Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Vach K; Petsos H; Hürzeler MB;
J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1144-1158. PubMed ID: 32510644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype.
Ahmedbeyli C; Ipçi ŞD; Cakar G; Kuru BE; Yılmaz S
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Mar; 41(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 24304099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of root coverage outcomes at single maxillary gingival recession with loss of interdental attachment: 3-year extension results from a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Cairo F; Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Nieri M; Mervelt J; Pagavino G; Pini-Prato GP
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jun; 42(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 25932592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller Class II and III gingival recessions in mandibular incisors: a case series.
Nart J; Valles C; Mareque S; Santos A; Sanz-Moliner J; Pascual A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Dec; 32(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 23057054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Rasperini G; Roccuzzo M; Francetti L; Acunzo R; Consonni D; Silvestri M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 21491012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial.
Zucchelli G; Mounssif I; Mazzotti C; Stefanini M; Marzadori M; Petracci E; Montebugnoli L
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 41(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 24382170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root coverage by coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft and/or enamel matrix derivative: a meta-analysis.
Cheng GL; Fu E; Tu YK; Shen EC; Chiu HC; Huang RY; Yuh DY; Chiang CY
J Periodontal Res; 2015 Apr; 50(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 25039691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The modified coronally advanced tunnel combined with an enamel matrix derivative and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of isolated mandibular Miller Class I and II gingival recessions: a report of 16 cases.
Sculean A; Cosgarea R; Stähli A; Katsaros C; Arweiler NB; Brecx M; Deppe H
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 25191672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
