246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24118475)
1. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel.
Anveden I; Lindberg M; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Isaksson M; Liden C; Sommerlund M; Wahlberg JE; Wilkinson JD; Willis CM
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 15209811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macro-video documentation patch tests.
Schuster C; Kränke B; Szolar-Platzer C; Aberer W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15859988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telethermography: an objective method for evaluating patch test reactions.
Laino L; Di Carlo A
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 20123644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.
Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure?
Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-treatment of nickel test areas with sodium lauryl sulfate detects nickel sensitivity in subjects reacting negatively to routinely performed patch tests.
Seidenari S; Motolese A; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 8681564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between laser Doppler perfusion imaging and visual scoring of patch test sites in subjects with experimentally induced allergic and irritant contact reactions.
Goon AT; Leow YH; Chan YH; Goh CL
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 14731251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulfate is associated with increased positive patch test reactions.
Schwitulla J; Brasch J; Löffler H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W
Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 24593017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stratum corneum profiles of inflammatory mediators in patch test reactions to common contact allergens and sodium lauryl sulfate.
Koppes SA; Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Jurakić Tončić R; Marinović B; Brans R; Gibbs S; Frings-Dresen MHW; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1533-1540. PubMed ID: 28382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible.
Mortz CG; Kjaer HF; Eller E; Osterballe M; Norberg LA; Høst A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Andersen KE
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Feb; 24(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23331531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmic products: can pre-treatment with sodium lauryl sulfate increase patch test sensitivity?
Corazza M; Virgili A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):239-41. PubMed ID: 15898995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel.
Hindsén M; Spirén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 15982224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.
Dickel H; Kreft B; Kuss O; Worm M; Soost S; Brasch J; Pfützner W; Grabbe J; Angelova-Fischer I; Elsner P; Fluhr J; Altmeyer P; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 May; 62(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 20536477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]