These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24118717)

  • 1. Selective memories: infants' encoding is enhanced in selection via suppression.
    Markant J; Amso D
    Dev Sci; 2013 Nov; 16(6):926-40. PubMed ID: 24118717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Development of Selective Attention Orienting is an Agent of Change in Learning and Memory Efficacy.
    Markant J; Amso D
    Infancy; 2016 Mar; 21(2):154-176. PubMed ID: 26957950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not all attention orienting is created equal: recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression.
    Markant J; Worden MS; Amso D
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Apr; 120():28-40. PubMed ID: 25701278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention neutralizes the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status on memory in 9-month-old infants.
    Markant J; Ackerman LK; Nussenbaum K; Amso D
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 18():26-33. PubMed ID: 26597046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exogenous attention influences visual short-term memory in infants.
    Ross-Sheehy S; Oakes LM; Luck SJ
    Dev Sci; 2011 May; 14(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 21477189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveling the playing field: attention mitigates the effects of intelligence on memory.
    Markant J; Amso D
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 24549142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relating dopaminergic and cholinergic polymorphisms to spatial attention in infancy.
    Markant J; Cicchetti D; Hetzel S; Thomas KM
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Feb; 50(2):360-9. PubMed ID: 23731290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Liaromati I; Masoura E; Chatzikallia K
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):524-31. PubMed ID: 20091411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.
    Weger UW; Inhoff AW
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 16507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placeholders dissociate two forms of inhibition of return.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Christie J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):360-371. PubMed ID: 27737621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripheral cues and gaze direction jointly focus attention and inhibition of return.
    Hudson M; Skarratt PA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 7(1-4):67-73. PubMed ID: 26257306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic orienting of visuospatial attention in Parkinson's disease.
    Briand KA; Hening W; Poizner H; Sereno AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(11):1240-9. PubMed ID: 11527561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing non-spatial from spatial biases in visual selection: neuropsychological evidence.
    Soto D; Mannan SK; Malhotra P; Rzeskiewicz A; Humphreys GW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jun; 137(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20979989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor IOR revealed for reaching.
    Cowper-Smith CD; Westwood DA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1914-22. PubMed ID: 24027029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.