139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119144)
1. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.
Rajan P; Hagman A; Sooriakumaran P; Nyberg T; Wallerstedt A; Adding C; Akre O; Carlsson S; Hosseini A; Olsson M; Egevad L; Wiklund F; Steineck G; Wiklund NP
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28753802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yang CW; Wang HH; Hassouna MF; Chand M; Huang WJS; Chung HJ
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14329. PubMed ID: 34253832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotic prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence (BCR): Multicenter analysis.
Fiorello N; Di Benedetto A; Brizzi L; Mogorovich A; Summonti D; Silvestri G; Benvenuti S; Sepich CA
Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):647-652. PubMed ID: 37354007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38155061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical factors associated with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
Kawase M; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 36928750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk classification system using the detailed positive surgical margin status for predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hatayama T; Goto K; Fujiyama K; Goriki A; Kaneko M; Mita K
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38512888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of the cribriform morphology area ratio for biochemical recurrence in Gleason score 4 + 4 prostate cancer patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Shimodaira K; Inoue R; Hashimoto T; Satake N; Shishido T; Namiki K; Harada K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Cancer Med; 2024 Mar; 13(5):e7086. PubMed ID: 38477506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration.
Bravi CA; Dell'Oglio P; Piazza P; Scarcella S; Bianchi L; Falagario U; Turri F; Andras I; Di Maida F; De Groote R; Piramide F; Moschovas MC; Suardi N; Terrone C; Carrieri G; Patel V; Autorino R; Porpiglia F; Vickers A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Larcher A;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38036328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine Learning to Delineate Surgeon and Clinical Factors That Anticipate Positive Surgical Margins After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Lee RS; Ma R; Pham S; Maya-Silva J; Nguyen JH; Aron M; Cen S; Daneshmand S; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1192-1198. PubMed ID: 35414218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes for men with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy-results from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative community-based registry.
Beckmann KR; O'Callaghan ME; Vincent AD; Moretti KL; Brook NR
Asian J Urol; 2023 Oct; 10(4):502-511. PubMed ID: 38024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; Lim A; Catterwell R; Selth L; O'Callaghan M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 36859711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Importance of Lymphovascular Invasion for Specific Subgroup of Patients with Prostate Cancer After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (The MSUG94 Group).
Kawase M; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):2154-2162. PubMed ID: 38200385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biochemical recurrence after chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in very-high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Sugino F; Nakane K; Kawase M; Ueda S; Tomioka M; Takeuchi Y; Yamada T; Namiki S; Kumada N; Kawase K; Kato D; Takai M; Iinuma K; Tobisawa Y; Ito T; Koie T
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 37466903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence and Correlation with Various Parameters After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Single Center Experience.
Singh M; Kathuria S; Jain S; Rasool S; Tyagi V; Gupta M; Pahwa M; Pandey H; Sharma A
Indian J Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 13(3):661-667. PubMed ID: 36187532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer.
Lee W; Lim B; Kyung YS; Kim CS
Prostate Int; 2021 Sep; 9(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 34692588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of risk-score model in patients with negative surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yamada Y; Fujii Y; Kakutani S; Kimura N; Sugimoto K; Hakozaki Y; Sugihara T; Takeshima Y; Kawai T; Nakamura M; Kamei J; Taguchi S; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Yamada D; Urabe F; Miyazaki H; Enomoto Y; Fukuhara H; Nakagawa T; Fujimura T; Kume H
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7607. PubMed ID: 38556562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk Biomarkers for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Using Clinical and MRI-Derived Semantic Features.
Guerra A; Alves FC; Maes K; Maio R; Villeirs G; Mouriño H
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Nov; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 37958468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.
Adili AF; Di Giovanni J; Kolesar E; Wong NC; Hoogenes J; Dason S; Shayegan B
Can Urol Assoc J; 2017 Nov; 11(11):E409-E413. PubMed ID: 29072565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The LaserSAFE technique.
Almeida-Magana R; Au M; Al-Hammouri T; Dinneen K; Haider A; Freeman A; Shaw G
BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):677-679. PubMed ID: 38009389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
