251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119347)
1. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules.
Kumar SG; Garg MK; Khandelwal N; Gupta P; Gupta D; Aggarwal AN; Bansal SC
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25892052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study.
Kim EY; Bista AB; Kim T; Park SY; Park KJ; Kang DK; Sun JS
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chest imaging with dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis.
Sone S; Kasuga T; Sakai F; Hirano H; Kubo K; Morimoto M; Takemura K; Hosoba M
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 8318295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detection of parenchymal lesions in active pulmonary tuberculosis.
Sharma M; Sandhu MS; Gorsi U; Gupta D; Khandelwal N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1820-7. PubMed ID: 26071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 17899105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.
Dobbins JT; McAdams HP; Sabol JM; Chakraborty DP; Kazerooni EA; Reddy GP; Vikgren J; Båth M
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27439324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between chest digital tomosynthesis and CT as a screening method to detect artificial pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Takeda T; Saito K; Umeda T; Sakaguchi K
Br J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 85(1017):e622-9. PubMed ID: 22422390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-exposure dual-energy chest images with computed radiography. Evaluation with simulated pulmonary nodules.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 8320065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: the influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection.
Kim SM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Kang H; Song IY; Lee EJ; Hwang HS
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23528563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19936752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
