117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119348)
1. Minimum detectable change in lung nodule volume in a phantom CT study.
Gavrielides MA; Li Q; Zeng R; Myers KJ; Sahiner B; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 24119348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination of Pulmonary Nodule Volume Change for Low- and High-contrast Tasks in a Phantom CT Study with Low-dose Protocols.
Gavrielides MA; Li Q; Zeng R; Berman BP; Sahiner B; Gong Q; Myers KJ; DeFilippo G; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):937-948. PubMed ID: 30292564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume.
Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Myers KJ; Sahiner B; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 23085408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.
Robins M; Solomon J; Sahbaee P; Sedlmair M; Roy Choudhury K; Pezeshk A; Sahiner B; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(18):7280-7299. PubMed ID: 28786399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters.
Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom: accuracy across different CT scanner technologies.
Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Katoh M; Bakai A; Salganicoff M; Stanzel S; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Wildberger JE
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17414525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images.
Petrick N; Kim HJ; Clunie D; Borradaile K; Ford R; Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; McNitt-Gray MF; Lu ZQ; Fenimore C; Zhao B; Buckler AJ
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24331262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical analysis of lung nodule volume measurements with CT in a large-scale phantom study.
Li Q; Gavrielides MA; Sahiner B; Myers KJ; Zeng R; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3932-47. PubMed ID: 26133594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric analysis of lung nodules in computed tomography (CT): comparison of two different segmentation algorithm softwares and two different reconstruction filters on automated volume calculation.
Christe A; Brönnimann A; Vock P
Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 23864063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study.
Linning E; Daqing M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study.
Ravenel JG; Leue WM; Nietert PJ; Miller JV; Taylor KK; Silvestri GA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 18430874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intrascanner variability of pulmonary nodule volumetry on low-dose 64-row CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Xie X; Willemink MJ; Zhao Y; de Jong PA; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; Greuter MJ; Vliegenthart R
Br J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 86(1029):20130160. PubMed ID: 23884758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction on reproducibility.
Wielpütz MO; Lederlin M; Wroblewski J; Dinkel J; Eichinger M; Biederer J; Kauczor HU; Puderbach M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1577-83. PubMed ID: 23727376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy.
Goo JM; Tongdee T; Tongdee R; Yeo K; Hildebolt CF; Bae KT
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15914478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Information-theoretic approach for analyzing bias and variance in lung nodule size estimation with CT: a phantom study.
Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Kinnard LM; Myers KJ; Petrick N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1795-807. PubMed ID: 20562039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
