These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119633)

  • 1. Incidence of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: Does the surgeon's experience have an influence on all pathological stages?
    Villamil AW; Costabel JI; Billordo Peres N; Martínez PF; Giudice CR; Damia OH
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24119633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
    Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Learning curve" may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Hong YM; Sutherland DE; Linder B; Engel JD
    J Endourol; 2010 Mar; 24(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 20073553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
    Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
    J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
    Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
    Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a preoperatively estimated prostate volume using transrectal ultrasonography on surgical and oncological outcomes in a single surgeon's experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hirasawa Y; Ohno Y; Nakashima J; Shimodaira K; Hashimoto T; Gondo T; Ohori M; Tachibana M; Yoshioka K
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3702-8. PubMed ID: 26578435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.
    Park J; Yoo DS; Song C; Park S; Park S; Kim SC; Cho Y; Ahn H
    World J Urol; 2014 Feb; 32(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 24062092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.