These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119779)

  • 1. Foot roll-over evaluation based on 3D dynamic foot scan.
    Samson W; Van Hamme A; Sanchez S; Chèze L; Van Sint Jan S; Feipel V
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):577-82. PubMed ID: 24119779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait.
    Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Collinsworth KM; Giesel CL; Williams DG; Kardouni CH; Molloy JM; Goffar SL; Christie DS; McPoil T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 19246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in dynamic plantar pressure during loaded gait.
    Goffar SL; Reber RJ; Christiansen BC; Miller RB; Naylor JA; Rodriguez BM; Walker MJ; Teyhen DS
    Phys Ther; 2013 Sep; 93(9):1175-84. PubMed ID: 23580629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements in adolescents].
    Tuna H; Yildiz M; Celtik C; Kokino S
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 15347920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running.
    Chuckpaiwong B; Nunley JA; Mall NA; Queen RM
    Gait Posture; 2008 Oct; 28(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 18337103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term step-to-step correlation in plantar pressure distributions during treadmill walking, and implications for footprint trail analysis.
    Pataky TC; Savage R; Bates KT; Sellers WI; Crompton RH
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1054-7. PubMed ID: 23597941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(6):489-94. PubMed ID: 17114602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in length of the plantar aponeurosis during the stance phase of gait--an in vivo dynamic fluoroscopic study.
    Fessel G; Jacob HA; Wyss Ch; Mittlmeier T; Müller-Gerbl M; Büttner A
    Ann Anat; 2014 Dec; 196(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 25113063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional analysis of the gibbon foot during terrestrial bipedal walking: plantar pressure distributions and three-dimensional ground reaction forces.
    Vereecke E; D'Août K; Van Elsacker L; De Clercq D; Aerts P
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Nov; 128(3):659-69. PubMed ID: 15861422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait functional assessment: Spatio-temporal analysis and classification of barefoot plantar pressure in a group of 11-12-year-old children.
    Latour E; Latour M; Arlet J; Adach Z; Bohatyrewicz A
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jul; 34(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 21782441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plantar pressure distribution in gait is not affected by targeted reduced plantar cutaneous sensation.
    Höhne A; Stark C; Brüggemann GP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 19201070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring medial longitudinal arch deformation during gait. A reliability study.
    Bencke J; Christiansen D; Jensen K; Okholm A; Sonne-Holm S; Bandholm T
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 22115733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional peak plantar pressures are highly sensitive to region boundary definitions.
    Pataky TC; Caravaggi P; Savage R; Crompton RH
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2772-5. PubMed ID: 18675421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Roll-over shapes of the able-bodied knee-ankle-foot system during gait initiation, steady-state walking, and gait termination.
    Miff SC; Hansen AH; Childress DS; Gard SA; Meier MR
    Gait Posture; 2008 Feb; 27(2):316-22. PubMed ID: 17544273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An anatomically unbiased foot template for inter-subject plantar pressure evaluation.
    Pataky TC; Bosch K; Mu T; Keijsers NL; Segers V; Rosenbaum D; Goulermas JY
    Gait Posture; 2011 Mar; 33(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 21227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of plantar surface visual assessment as an estimate of foot arch height.
    Swedler DI; Knapik JJ; Grier T; Jones BH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 19927021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative comparison of plantar foot shapes under different weight-bearing conditions.
    Tsung BY; Zhang M; Fan YB; Boone DA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 15077664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability of the Win-Track platform in analyzing the gait parameters and plantar pressures during barefoot walking in healthy adults.
    Ramachandra P; Maiya AG; Kumar P
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2012 Oct; 5(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 22956663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insole-pressure distribution for normal children in different age groups.
    Liu XC; Lyon R; Thometz JG; Curtin B; Tarima S; Tassone C
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Sep; 31(6):705-9. PubMed ID: 21841449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.