These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24119917)

  • 1. Fracture risk of lithium-disilicate ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis.
    Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Wichelhaus A; Hickel R; Huth K
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1244-50. PubMed ID: 24119917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk?
    Holberg C; Rudzki-Janson I; Wichelhaus A; Winterhalder P
    J Dent; 2013 Jul; 41(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 23639702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.
    Uzgur R; Ercan E; Uzgur Z; Çolak H; Yalçın M; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 27517616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 10.9-year survival of pressed acid etched monolithic e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and the type of partial coverage restoration (inlay or onlay).
    Malament KA; Margvelashvili-Malament M; Natto ZS; Thompson V; Rekow D; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):523-532. PubMed ID: 33012530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
    Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elastic Properties of Lithium Disilicate Versus Feldspathic Inlays: Effect on the Bonding by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Trindade FZ; Valandro LF; de Jager N; Bottino MA; Kleverlaan CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):741-747. PubMed ID: 27696615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture strength of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
    Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Uphaus A; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1513-20. PubMed ID: 17368743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
    Liu X; Fok A; Li H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 2. Fixed partial denture design: a finite element analysis.
    Thompson MC; Field CJ; Swain MV
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Sep; 56(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 21884147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD/CAM all -ceramic inlay and polymerid porcelain inlay in restoration of posterior Class II cavity].
    Yu WQ; Yu M; Yao LL; Wang CH; Wang M; Fan C
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-64. PubMed ID: 29946644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of tooth mobility on critical stresses in all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study.
    Möllers K; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22104732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of ceramic thickness and composite bases on stress distribution of inlays--a finite element analysis.
    Durand LB; Guimarães JC; Monteiro Junior S; Baratieri LN
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25831105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.