280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24120564)
1. Compliance by California tanning facilities with the nation's first statewide ban on use before the age of 18 years.
Grewal SK; Haas AF; Pletcher MJ; Resneck JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 69(6):883-889.e4. PubMed ID: 24120564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing two methods of measuring legislation compliance among indoor tanning facilities.
Hurd AL; Mayer JA; Woodruff SI; Belch GE; Patel MR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Mar; 54(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 16488294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego.
Culley CA; Mayer JA; Eckhardt L; Busic AJ; Eichenfield LF; Sallis JF; Quintana PJ; Woodruff SI
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Jan; 44(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11148477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legislation restricting access to indoor tanning throughout the world.
Pawlak MT; Bui M; Amir M; Burkhardt DL; Chen AK; Dellavalle RP
Arch Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 148(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 22801924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of indoor tanning legislation: newspaper coverage of the risks of indoor tanning before and after the California indoor tanning ban for minors.
Mayer JE; Swetter SM; Guild S; Geller AC
J Cancer Educ; 2015 Mar; 30(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 24882438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compliance with age and skin type restrictions following the introduction of indoor tanning legislation in Melbourne, Australia.
Makin JK; Hearne K; Dobbinson SJ
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2011 Dec; 27(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 22092731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compliance with youth access regulations for indoor UV tanning.
Hester EJ; Heilig LF; D'Ambrosia R; Drake AL; Schilling LM; Dellavalle RP
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 16103323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lessons from a Legislative Struggle to Ban Indoor Tanning for Children Younger than 18.
Boyers LN; Karimkhani C; Guild SR; Dellavalle RP
Pediatr Dermatol; 2015; 32(4):553-6. PubMed ID: 26184402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation from the use of indoor tanning equipment: time to ban the tan.
Lim HW; James WD; Rigel DS; Maloney ME; Spencer JM; Bhushan R
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):e51-60. PubMed ID: 21295374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Youth access to artificial UV radiation exposure: practices of 3647 US indoor tanning facilities.
Pichon LC; Mayer JA; Hoerster KD; Woodruff SI; Slymen DJ; Belch GE; Clapp EJ; Hurd AL; Forster JL; Weinstock MA
Arch Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 145(9):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19770438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation.
Reimann J; McWhirter JE; Papadopoulos A; Dewey C
BMC Public Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):1096. PubMed ID: 30285702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance with restrictions on sale of indoor tanning sessions to youth in Minnesota and Massachusetts.
Forster JL; Lazovich D; Hickle A; Sorensen G; Demierre MF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):962-7. PubMed ID: 17097392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enforcement of state indoor tanning laws in the United States.
Mayer JA; Hoerster KD; Pichon LC; Rubio DA; Woodruff SI; Forster JL
Prev Chronic Dis; 2008 Oct; 5(4):A125. PubMed ID: 18793513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A case for informed consent? Indoor UV tanning facility operator's provision of health risks information (United States).
Heilig LF; D'Ambrosia R; Drake AL; Dellavalle RP; Hester EJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Jun; 16(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 15986110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practices of unregulated tanning facilities in Missouri: implications for statewide legislation.
Balaraman B; Biesbroeck LK; Lickerman SH; Cornelius LA; Jeffe DB
Pediatrics; 2013 Mar; 131(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 23439910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Growing Public Health Challenges of Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation From Use of Indoor Tanning Devices in the United States.
Bowman DM; Lewis RC; Lee MS; Yao CJ
New Solut; 2015 Aug; 25(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 25995373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indoor UV tanning operator opinion regarding youth access: an electronic survey.
Hester EJ; Johnson KR; Crane LA; Schilling LM; Dellavalle RP
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 51(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 15523366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tanning bed legislation and the dermatologist.
Foo TA; Dellavalle RP
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2013 Dec; 32(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24800429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-California tanning ban: a brief update on current youth access laws.
Chen LL; Wang SQ
Arch Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 148(9):1071-2. PubMed ID: 22801588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are artificial tans the new cigarette? How plaintiffs can use the lessons of tobacco litigation in bringing claims against the indoor tanning industry.
Loh AY
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 107(2):365-90. PubMed ID: 19031654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
