315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24121775)
1. On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Legarra A
Genetics; 2013 Dec; 195(4):1223-30. PubMed ID: 24121775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.
Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-allelic haplotype model based on genetic partition for genomic prediction and variance component estimation using SNP markers.
Da Y
BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():144. PubMed ID: 26678438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):453-462. PubMed ID: 28833716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.
Da Y; Wang C; Wang S; Hu G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87666. PubMed ID: 24498162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects.
Wang C; Prakapenka D; Wang S; Pulugurta S; Runesha HB; Da Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):270. PubMed ID: 25107495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for fertility and reproduction traits in North American Holstein cattle using genomic information.
Alves K; Brito LF; Baes CF; Sargolzaei M; Robinson JAB; Schenkel FS
J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 May; 137(3):316-330. PubMed ID: 31912573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic prediction with non-additive effects in beef cattle: stability of variance component and genetic effect estimates against population size.
Onogi A; Watanabe T; Ogino A; Kurogi K; Togashi K
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):512. PubMed ID: 34233617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide association mapping for dominance effects in female fertility using real and simulated data from Danish Holstein cattle.
Mao X; Sahana G; Johansson AM; Liu A; Ismael A; Løvendahl P; De Koning DJ; Guldbrandtsen B
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2953. PubMed ID: 32076041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Zhang Y; Reverter A; Barendse W; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):26. PubMed ID: 25880217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
