These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24122399)

  • 21. Six-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tarantini G; Barioli A; Facchin M; Frigo AC; Napodano M; Buja P; D'Amico G; Iliceto S; Isabella G
    Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 23695366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.
    Claessen BE; Smits PC; Kereiakes DJ; Parise H; Fahy M; Kedhi E; Serruys PW; Lansky AJ; Cristea E; Sudhir K; Sood P; Simonton CA; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22115661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The unrestricted use of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents results in better clinical outcomes during 6-year follow-up than bare-metal stents: an analysis of the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) registries.
    Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta ST; Gaspersz MP; van der Giessen WJ; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1051-8. PubMed ID: 20965464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with long coronary artery disease.
    Kim YH; Park SW; Lee SW; Park DW; Yun SC; Lee CW; Hong MK; Kim HS; Ko JK; Park JH; Lee JH; Choi SW; Seong IW; Cho YH; Lee NH; Kim JH; Chun KJ; Park SJ;
    Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(20):2148-53. PubMed ID: 17060388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial.
    Leon MB; Nikolsky E; Cutlip DE; Mauri L; Liberman H; Wilson H; Patterson J; Moses J; Kandzari DE;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20965463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.
    Doi H; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Yu A; Wang H; Mandinov L; Popma JJ; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ; Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1269-75. PubMed ID: 20129555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-hospital and 1-year outcomes among unselected percutaneous coronary intervention patients treated with either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry.
    Novack V; Cutlip D; Kleiman N; Pencina M; Mauri L; Yen CH; Berger P; Goldberg S; Kellett M; Waksman R; Hong M; Raizner AE; Cohen DJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19695546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
    Mehilli J; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Bruskina O; Iijima R; Schulz S; Pache J; Seyfarth M; Massberg S; Laugwitz KL; Dirschinger J; Schömig A;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 May; 53(19):1760-8. PubMed ID: 19422982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Propensity-Score Matched Comparison of Midterm Angiographic Outcomes of Sirolimus- Versus Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents for De Novo Coronary Stenosis.
    Suzuki K; Ishikawa T; Mutoh M; Sakamoto H; Mori C; Ogawa T; Hashimoto K; Kubota T; Komukai K; Yoshimura M;
    Int Heart J; 2017 May; 58(3):320-327. PubMed ID: 28484124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Five-year clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in high-risk patients.
    Birkmeier KA; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Holle H; Schulz S; Tiroch K; Kufner S; Massberg S; Laugwitz KL; Schömig A; Mehilli J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 77(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 20824758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Six-month angiographic and one-year clinical outcomes of polymer free paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.
    Dang Q; Li YJ; Gao L; Jin Z; Gou LX
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Oct; 125(19):3393-7. PubMed ID: 23044294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Propensity-matched lesion-based comparison of midterm outcomes of TAXUS Express and TAXUS Liberté stents for de novo native coronary stenosis.
    Ishikawa T; Nakano Y; Hino S; Suzuki T; Murakami A; Tsutsumi J; Miyamoto T; Mutoh M
    J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 62(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 23806548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Leon MB; Kandzari DE; Eisenstein EL; Anstrom KJ; Mauri L; Cutlip DE; Nikolsky E; O'Shaughnessy C; Overlie PA; Kirtane AJ; McLaurin BT; Solomon SL; Douglas JS; Popma JJ;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1208-18. PubMed ID: 20129547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.
    Morice MC; Colombo A; Meier B; Serruys P; Tamburino C; Guagliumi G; Sousa E; Stoll HP;
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(8):895-904. PubMed ID: 16493102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of three-year clinical outcomes between sirolimus-versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients: prospective randomized multicenter trial.
    Hong SJ; Kim MH; Cha KS; Park HS; Chae SC; Hur SH; Gwon HC; Bae JH; Lim DS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Dec; 76(7):924-33. PubMed ID: 20815045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.
    Airoldi F; Briguori C; Iakovou I; Stankovic G; Biondi-Zoccai G; Carlino M; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Cosgrave J; Michev I; Rogacka R; Sangiorgi GM; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 97(8):1182-7. PubMed ID: 16616023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical and angiographic outcomes in diabetics from the ENDEAVOR IV trial: randomized comparison of zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Kirtane AJ; Patel R; O'Shaughnessy C; Overlie P; McLaurin B; Solomon S; Mauri L; Fitzgerald P; Popma JJ; Kandzari DE; Leon MB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 2(10):967-76. PubMed ID: 19850257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decreased risk of stent fracture-related restenosis between paclitaxel-eluting stents and sirolimus eluting stents: results of long-term follow-up.
    Freixa X; Almasood AS; Khan SQ; Wainstein R; Osherov A; Mackie K; Seidelin PH; Džavík V
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 21567881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Garg S; Serruys P; Onuma Y; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hébert K; Sudhir K; Boland J; Huber K; Garcia E; te Riele JA;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 20129545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Dangas GD; Serruys PW; Kereiakes DJ; Hermiller J; Rizvi A; Newman W; Sudhir K; Smith RS; Cao S; Theodoropoulos K; Cutlip DE; Lansky AJ; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.