85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24122948)
1. Ten-year health-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients: prospective SF-36 data with SF-6D conversion.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Honeder C; Shipp D; Nedzelski J; Chen J
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jan; 124(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 24122948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unilateral multi-channel cochlear implantation results in significant improvement in quality of life.
Chung J; Chueng K; Shipp D; Friesen L; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 22569148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.
Francis HW; Chee N; Yeagle J; Cheng A; Niparko JK
Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1482-8. PubMed ID: 12172266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair.
Aljabri B; Al Wahaibi K; Abner D; Mackenzie KS; Corriveau MM; Obrand DI; Meshefedjian G; Steinmetz OK
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1182-1187. PubMed ID: 17145419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting health-utility scores from the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire in a multicenter nationwide study of anterior cervical spine surgery.
Skolasky RL; Carreon LY; Anderson PA; Albert TJ; Riley LH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):2211-6. PubMed ID: 21343870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting SF-6D from the European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire scores in patients with colorectal cancer.
Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Rowen D
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 23538190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index to short-form 6D utility scores.
Lee L; Kaneva P; Latimer E; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2014 Jan; 186(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 24021906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility.
Lee L; Elfassy N; Li C; Latimer E; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Carli F; Fried GM; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23522456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis on health utilities using SF-6D and the health utility index.
Dan AA; Kallman JB; Srivastava R; Younoszai Z; Kim A; Younossi ZM
Liver Transpl; 2008 Mar; 14(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 18306356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index.
O'Brien BJ; Spath M; Blackhouse G; Severens JL; Dorian P; Brazier J
Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 12(11):975-81. PubMed ID: 14601159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life.
Sparreboom M; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 138(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22248561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures.
Cranney AB; Coyle D; Hopman WM; Hum V; Power B; Tugwell PS
J Rheumatol; 2005 Dec; 32(12):2393-9. PubMed ID: 16331770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serial change in health-related quality of life over 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors of health outcomes.
Fairbairn TA; Meads DM; Mather AN; Motwani M; Pavitt S; Plein S; Blackman DJ; Greenwood JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1672-80. PubMed ID: 22554597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.
Bichey BG; Miyamoto RT
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 May; 138(5):655-61. PubMed ID: 18439474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
