These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24122949)

  • 1. Migrated Essure permanent birth control device: sonographic findings.
    Khati NJ; Gorodenker J; Brindle KA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2014 May; 42(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 24122949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
    Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Office ultrasound should be the first-line investigation for confirmation of correct ESSURE placement.
    Weston G; Bowditch J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 16029299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
    Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sonography, CT, and MRI appearance of the Essure microinsert permanent birth control device.
    Wittmer MH; Brown DL; Hartman RP; Famuyide AO; Kawashima A; King BF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):959-64. PubMed ID: 16985143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound detection of the Essure permanent birth control device: a case series.
    Teoh M; Meagher S; Kovacs G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 43(5):378-80. PubMed ID: 14717316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
    Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Pilot Study Comparing 2- and 3-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging for Confirmation of Essure Fallopian Tube Pregnancy Prevention Implants.
    Godfroy M; Lopes P; Le Vaillant C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 30428382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound.
    Veersema S; Vleugels MP; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1733-6. PubMed ID: 16359973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging findings in Essure-related complications: a pictorial review.
    Djeffal H; Blouet M; Pizzoferato AC; Vardon D; Belloy F; Pelage JP
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170686. PubMed ID: 29927633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
    Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithm of Transvaginal Ultrasound and/or Hysterosalpingogram for Confirmation Testing at 3 Months after Essure Placement.
    Vleugels M; Cheng RF; Goldstein J; Bangerter K; Connor V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1128-1135. PubMed ID: 28669895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasonography as a method to determine the correct implantation of intratubaric devices].
    García-Lavandeira S; Vázquez-Rodríguez M; Blanco-Pérez S; Pato-Mosquera M; Janeiro-Freire MJ; Araújo-Fernández JE
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2014 Aug; 82(8):523-9. PubMed ID: 25282944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
    Connor VF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of the interpretation of coronal 3D ultrasound view of the uterus to evaluate the position of Essure
    Capmas P; Letendre I; Levaillant JM; Fuchs F; Panel P; Chambon G; Villefranque V; Levy-Zauberman Y; Fernandez H
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):571-573. PubMed ID: 28676451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral placement of the Adiana device after failed bilateral placement of the Essure device for hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Gimpelson RJ; Wagner CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):660-1. PubMed ID: 20728829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
    Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical Management After Hysteroscopic Sterilization: Minimally Invasive Approach Incorporating Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Symptomatic Patients with >2 Essure® Devices.
    Sills ES; Rickers NS; Li X
    Surg Technol Int; 2018 Jun; 32():156-161. PubMed ID: 29791712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes in the ultrasound follow-up of the Essure micro-insert: complications and proper placement.
    Thiel J; Suchet I; Tyson N; Price P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Feb; 33(2):134-138. PubMed ID: 21352631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.