These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123120)
1. Spatially regularized estimation for the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. Sommer JC; Gertheiss J; Schmid VJ Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1029-41. PubMed ID: 24123120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Boosting in Nonlinear Regression Models with an Application to DCE-MRI Data. Feilke M; Bischl B; Schmid VJ; Gertheiss J Methods Inf Med; 2016; 55(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 26577400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating kinetic parameter maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using spatial prior knowledge. Kelm BM; Menze BH; Nix O; Zechmann CM; Hamprecht FA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1534-47. PubMed ID: 19369150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on Bayesian P-splines. Schmid VJ; Whitcher B; Padhani AR; Yang GZ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jun; 28(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 19272996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions. Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smoothness selection for penalized quantile regression splines. Reiss PT; Huang L Int J Biostat; 2012 May; 8(1):Article 10. PubMed ID: 22628358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data. Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A sparse and spatially constrained generative regression model for fMRI data analysis. Oikonomou VP; Blekas K; Astrakas L IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 21216698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling and estimation of multicomponent T(2) distributions. Layton KJ; Morelande M; Wright D; Farrell PM; Moran B; Johnston LA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1423-34. PubMed ID: 23629849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noise and signal estimation in magnitude MRI and Rician distributed images: a LMMSE approach. Aja-Fernandez S; Alberola-Lopez C; Westin CF IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1383-98. PubMed ID: 18632347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering. Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sparse time series chain graphical models for reconstructing genetic networks. Abegaz F; Wit E Biostatistics; 2013 Jul; 14(3):586-99. PubMed ID: 23462022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the selection of optimal flip angles for T1 mapping of breast tumors with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Zhang JL; Koh TS IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jun; 53(6):1209-14. PubMed ID: 16761851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast and robust parameter estimation for statistical partial volume models in brain MRI. Tohka J; Zijdenbos A; Evans A Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 15325355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local estimation of the noise level in MRI using structural adaptation. Tabelow K; Voss HU; Polzehl J Med Image Anal; 2015 Feb; 20(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 25465845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model-based and model-free parametric analysis of breast dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI. Eyal E; Degani H NMR Biomed; 2009 Jan; 22(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 18022997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iterative approach of dual regression with a sparse prior enhances the performance of independent component analysis for group functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Kim YH; Kim J; Lee JH Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1864-89. PubMed ID: 22939873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes. Woolrich MW; Behrens TE; Smith SM Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1748-61. PubMed ID: 15050595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]