BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123401)

  • 1. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
    Schatz P; Maerlender A
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
    Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
    O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
    Brett BL; Solomon GS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
    Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity and specificity of subacute computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom evaluation in predicting outcomes after sports-related concussion.
    Lau BC; Collins MW; Lovell MR
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1209-16. PubMed ID: 21285444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
    MacDonald J; Duerson D
    Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
    Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
    Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion.
    Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 16019644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
    Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
    Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance.
    Moser RS; Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Ott SD
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2325-30. PubMed ID: 21828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factor Structure of ImPACT® in Adolescent Student Athletes.
    Gerrard PB; Iverson GL; Atkins JE; Maxwell BA; Zafonte R; Schatz P; Berkner PD
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 32(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 28122770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes.
    Schatz P; Pardini JE; Lovell MR; Collins MW; Podell K
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16143492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to acute concussive injury in soccer players: is gender a modifying factor?
    Zuckerman SL; Solomon GS; Forbes JA; Haase RF; Sills AK; Lovell MR
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2012 Dec; 10(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 23030348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
    Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized neuropsychological profiles of South African versus US athletes: a basis for commentary on cross-cultural norming issues in the sports concussion arena.
    Shuttleworth-Edwards AB; Whitefield-Alexander VJ; Radloff SE; Taylor AM; Lovell MR
    Phys Sportsmed; 2009 Dec; 37(4):45-52. PubMed ID: 20048540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in neuropsychological function and post-concussion symptoms of concussed collegiate athletes.
    Covassin T; Schatz P; Swanik CB
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):345-50; discussion 350-1. PubMed ID: 17762747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One year test-retest reliability of neurocognitive baseline scores in 10- to 12-year olds.
    Moser RS; Schatz P; Grosner E; Kollias K
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 27182767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of age and sex in symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and postural stability in athletes after concussion.
    Covassin T; Elbin RJ; Harris W; Parker T; Kontos A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Jun; 40(6):1303-12. PubMed ID: 22539534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cutoff scores in neurocognitive testing and symptom clusters that predict protracted recovery from concussions in high school athletes.
    Lau BC; Collins MW; Lovell MR
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):371-9; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 21841522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.