164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123401)
21. The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes.
Fazio VC; Lovell MR; Pardini JE; Collins MW
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 17917171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are psychotropic medications associated with differences in baseline neurocognitive assessment scores for young athletes? A pilot study.
Yengo-Kahn AM; Solomon G
Phys Sportsmed; 2015 Jul; 43(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 26200262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 1 year test-retest reliability of ImPACT in professional ice hockey players.
Bruce J; Echemendia R; Meeuwisse W; Comper P; Sisco A
Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 24345194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing battery and traditional neuropsychological measures: a construct and concurrent validity study.
Allen BJ; Gfeller JD
Brain Inj; 2011; 25(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 21219090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retest reliability in adolescents of a computerized neuropsychological battery used to assess recovery from concussion.
Segalowitz SJ; Mahaney P; Santesso DL; MacGregor L; Dywan J; Willer B
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 17917174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Concussion Baseline Testing: Preexisting Factors, Symptoms, and Neurocognitive Performance.
Cottle JE; Hall EE; Patel K; Barnes KP; Ketcham CJ
J Athl Train; 2017 Feb; 52(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 28071936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploring differences in computerized neurocognitive concussion testing between African American and White athletes.
Kontos AP; Elbin RJ; Covassin T; Larson E
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Dec; 25(8):734-44. PubMed ID: 20861034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Valid but Invalid: Suboptimal ImPACT Baseline Performance in University Athletes.
Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Cullum CM; Resch JE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 29485429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: how athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection.
Erdal K
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Aug; 27(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 22684033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adolescent Subtest Norms for the ImPACT Neurocognitive Battery.
Henry LC; Sandel N
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2015; 4(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 25412432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. One-month test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery.
Schatz P; Ferris CS
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Aug; 28(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 23702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship of soccer heading to computerized neurocognitive performance and symptoms among female and male youth soccer players.
Kontos AP; Dolese A; Elbin RJ; Covassin T; Warren BL
Brain Inj; 2011; 25(12):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21902552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population.
Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficacy of amantadine treatment on symptoms and neurocognitive performance among adolescents following sports-related concussion.
Reddy CC; Collins M; Lovell M; Kontos AP
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2013; 28(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 22613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship between subjective test feedback provided by high-school athletes during computer-based assessment of baseline cognitive functioning and self-reported symptoms.
Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Moser RS; Karpf R
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Jun; 25(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 20363733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-year Test-Retest Reliability of ImPACT in High School Athletes.
Tsushima WT; Siu AM; Pearce AM; Zhang G; Oshiro RS
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Feb; 31(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 26572159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison and utility of King-Devick and ImPACT® composite scores in adolescent concussion patients.
Tjarks BJ; Dorman JC; Valentine VD; Munce TA; Thompson PA; Kindt SL; Bergeron MF
J Neurol Sci; 2013 Nov; 334(1-2):148-53. PubMed ID: 24007870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The "value added" of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion.
Van Kampen DA; Lovell MR; Pardini JE; Collins MW; Fu FH
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1630-5. PubMed ID: 16816151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
