409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123598)
21. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen H; Li F; Zhao X; Yuan C; Rutt B; Kerwin WS
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):868-78. PubMed ID: 21394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of High Grade Brain Gliomas Obtained with Arterial or Venous Waveform Input Function.
Filice S; Crisi G
J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 25923172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model.
Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of a T1 and T2* leakage correction method based on multiecho dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using MION as a reference standard.
Stokes AM; Semmineh N; Quarles CC
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):613-25. PubMed ID: 26362714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate: comparison of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA.
Durmus T; Vollnberg B; Schwenke C; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Taupitz M; Franiel T
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):862-8. PubMed ID: 23888476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of vessel permeability by combining dynamic contrast-enhanced and arterial spin labeling MRI.
Liu HL; Chang TT; Yan FX; Li CH; Lin YS; Wong AM
NMR Biomed; 2015 Jun; 28(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 25880892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluate VEGF expression in brain glioma? An MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy study.
Di N; Cheng W; Jiang X; Liu X; Zhou J; Xie Q; Chu Z; Chen H; Wang B
J Neuroradiol; 2019 May; 46(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 29752976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Free-breathing quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a rat liver tumor model using dynamic radial T(1) mapping.
Braren R; Curcic J; Remmele S; Altomonte J; Ebert O; Rummeny EJ; Steingoetter A
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):624-31. PubMed ID: 21577121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas.
Harrer JU; Parker GJ; Haroon HA; Buckley DL; Embelton K; Roberts C; Balériaux D; Jackson A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):748-57. PubMed ID: 15503330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MRI protocol optimization for quantitative DCE-MRI of the spine.
Lavini C; Kramer G; Pieters-den Bos I; Hoekstra O; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():96-103. PubMed ID: 28867668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function.
Kim JH; Im GH; Yang J; Choi D; Lee WJ; Lee JH
NMR Biomed; 2012 Apr; 25(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 21954069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
