These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123672)

  • 1. Nonpareil: a redundancy-based approach to assess the level of coverage in metagenomic datasets.
    Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 24123672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonpareil 3: Fast Estimation of Metagenomic Coverage and Sequence Diversity.
    Rodriguez-R LM; Gunturu S; Tiedje JM; Cole JR; Konstantinidis KT
    mSystems; 2018; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 29657970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
    Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a unified medical microbiome ecology of the OMU for metagenomes and the OTU for microbes.
    Ma ZS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):137. PubMed ID: 38553666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MetaFast: fast reference-free graph-based comparison of shotgun metagenomic data.
    Ulyantsev VI; Kazakov SV; Dubinkina VB; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2760-7. PubMed ID: 27259541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the total genome length of a metagenomic sample using k-mers.
    Hua K; Zhang X
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(Suppl 2):183. PubMed ID: 30967110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
    Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
    Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metagenome sequence clustering with hash-based canopies.
    Rahman MA; LaPierre N; Rangwala H; Barbara D
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(6):1740006. PubMed ID: 29113561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A user's guide to quantitative and comparative analysis of metagenomic datasets.
    Luo C; Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():525-47. PubMed ID: 24060135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cultivation-independent genomes greatly expand taxonomic-profiling capabilities of mOTUs across various environments.
    Ruscheweyh HJ; Milanese A; Paoli L; Karcher N; Clayssen Q; Keller MI; Wirbel J; Bork P; Mende DR; Zeller G; Sunagawa S
    Microbiome; 2022 Dec; 10(1):212. PubMed ID: 36464731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subtractive assembly for comparative metagenomics, and its application to type 2 diabetes metagenomes.
    Wang M; Doak TG; Ye Y
    Genome Biol; 2015 Nov; 16():243. PubMed ID: 26527161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual genome assembly from complex community short-read metagenomic datasets.
    Luo C; Tsementzi D; Kyrpides NC; Konstantinidis KT
    ISME J; 2012 Apr; 6(4):898-901. PubMed ID: 22030673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
    Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploration and retrieval of whole-metagenome sequencing samples.
    Seth S; Välimäki N; Kaski S; Honkela A
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2471-9. PubMed ID: 24845653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vikodak--A Modular Framework for Inferring Functional Potential of Microbial Communities from 16S Metagenomic Datasets.
    Nagpal S; Haque MM; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148347. PubMed ID: 26848568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ASAR: visual analysis of metagenomes in R.
    Orakov AN; Sakenova NK; Sorokin A; Goryanin II
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 34(8):1404-1405. PubMed ID: 29211828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Captured metagenomics: large-scale targeting of genes based on 'sequence capture' reveals functional diversity in soils.
    Manoharan L; Kushwaha SK; Hedlund K; Ahrén D
    DNA Res; 2015 Dec; 22(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 26490729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control of microbiota metagenomics by k-mer analysis.
    Plaza Onate F; Batto JM; Juste C; Fadlallah J; Fougeroux C; Gouas D; Pons N; Kennedy S; Levenez F; Dore J; Ehrlich SD; Gorochov G; Larsen M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):183. PubMed ID: 25887914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining diversity in metagenomic datasets by phylogenetic-based feature weighting.
    Albanese D; De Filippo C; Cavalieri D; Donati C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004186. PubMed ID: 25815895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of metagenomic sequences: methods and challenges.
    Mande SS; Mohammed MH; Ghosh TS
    Brief Bioinform; 2012 Nov; 13(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 22962338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.