These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24123711)

  • 1. A comparison of statistical methods for combining relative bioactivities from parallel line bioassays.
    Mzolo T; Hendriks M; van den Heuvel E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 24123711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals for the difference in paired Youden indices.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 23090764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalized confidence intervals for ratios of regression coefficients with applications to bioassays.
    Bebu I; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 19894218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multivariate bioassay, combination of bioassays, and Fieller's theorem.
    Srivastava MS
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 3719050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the weighted z-test the best method for combining probabilities from independent tests?
    Chen Z
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Apr; 24(4):926-30. PubMed ID: 21401770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals of effect size for paired studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 17634978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of means of two lognormal distributions based on samples with multiple detection limits.
    Krishnamoorthy K; Mathew T; Xu Z
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(8):538-46. PubMed ID: 24467286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals of effect size in randomized comparative parallel-group studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G; Wei W
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 16158411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing equivalence of two assays using sensitivity and specificity.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 17479392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies.
    Willavize SA; Morgenthien EA
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a log-normal mean.
    Wu J; Wong AC; Jiang G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1849-60. PubMed ID: 12754720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.