These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24124300)

  • 1. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of direct digital radiography system, filtered images, and subtraction radiography.
    Takeshita WM; Vessoni Iwaki LC; Da Silva MC; Filho LI; Queiroz Ade F; Geron LB
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Jul; 4(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 24124300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of digital subtraction radiography in detecting artificially created osteophytes and erosions in the temporomandibular joint.
    Demirturk Kocasarac H; Celenk P
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Jun; 47(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 28680846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Digital Subtraction Radiography in the Detection of Vertical Root Fractures.
    Queiroz PM; Nascimento HA; da Paz TD; Anacleto FN; Freitas DQ
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 27080116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction radiography in detection of vertical root fractures: accuracy evaluation for root canal filling, fracture orientation and width variables. An ex-vivo study.
    Kapralos V; Koutroulis A; Irinakis E; Kouros P; Lyroudia K; Pitas I; Mikrogeorgis G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3671-3681. PubMed ID: 32080760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of a direct digital radiographic-CMOS image with four types of filtered images for the detection of occlusal caries.
    Sahu RK; Rajguru JP; Pattnaiak N; Bardhan D; Nayak B
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2020 Jan; 9(1):206-214. PubMed ID: 32110592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of simulated external root resorptions with digital radiography and digital subtraction radiography.
    Ono E; Medici Filho E; Faig Leite H; Tanaka JL; De Moraes ME; De Melo Castilho JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 21392686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Digital Bitewing Radiography versus Different Views of Digital Panoramic Radiography for Detection of Proximal Caries.
    Abdinian M; Razavi SM; Faghihian R; Samety AA; Faghihian E
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Apr; 12(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 26622284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars. Part III. Anatomic features revealed by digital subtraction radiography.
    Fan W; Fan B; Gutmann JL; Fan M
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18793917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of digital subtraction radiography in combination with a contrast media in assessment of proximal caries depth.
    Valizadeh S; Ehsani S; Esmaeili F; Tavakoli MA
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2008; 2(3):77-81. PubMed ID: 23277849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.