These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24124969)

  • 1. The new glucose standard POCT12-A3 misses the mark.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1400-2. PubMed ID: 24124969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bedside Glucose Monitoring-Is it Safe? A New, Regulatory-Compliant Risk Assessment Evaluation Protocol in Critically Ill Patient Care Settings.
    DuBois JA; Slingerland RJ; Fokkert M; Roman A; Tran NK; Clarke W; Sartori DA; Palmieri TL; Malic A; Lyon ME; Lyon AW
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Apr; 45(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28169943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective evaluation of the accuracy of Roche AccuChek Inform and Nova StatStrip glucose meters when used on critically ill patients.
    Karon BS; Blanshan CT; Deobald GR; Wockenfus AM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Dec; 16(12):828-32. PubMed ID: 25093919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.
    Joseph JI
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1288-93. PubMed ID: 24124956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings.
    Mitsios JV; Ashby LA; Haverstick DM; Bruns DE; Scott MG
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1282-7. PubMed ID: 24124955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Accuracy Guidelines for Hospital Glucose Meters.
    Bowman CF; Nichols JH
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):546-552. PubMed ID: 31983225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use.
    Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement accuracy of two professional-use systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Kamecke U; Liebing C; Pleus S; Freckmann G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 58(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 31693491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a Modern Glucose Meter in ICU and General Hospital Inpatients: 3 Years of Real-World Paired Meter and Central Laboratory Results.
    Zhang R; Isakow W; Kollef MH; Scott MG
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1509-1514. PubMed ID: 28640025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The variability of results between point-of-care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer.
    Khan AI; Vasquez Y; Gray J; Wians FH; Kroll MH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Oct; 130(10):1527-32. PubMed ID: 17090196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine.
    Mancini A; Esposto G; Manfrini S; Rilli S; Tinti G; Carta G; Petrolati L; Vidali M; Barocci S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 29783898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative performance assessment of point-of-care testing devices for measuring glucose and ketones at the patient bedside.
    Ceriotti F; Kaczmarek E; Guerra E; Mastrantonio F; Lucarelli F; Valgimigli F; Mosca A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 25519295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance.
    Krouwer JS; Cembrowski GS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20167170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tighter accuracy standards within point-of-care blood glucose monitoring: how six commonly used systems compare.
    Robinson CS; Sharp P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 22768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197?
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Pleus S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system.
    Brazg R; Hughes K; Martin P; Coard J; Toffaletti J; McDonnell E; Taylor E; Farrell L; Patel M; Ward J; Chen T; Alva S; Ng R
    Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Jun; 421():243-50. PubMed ID: 23537735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the quality of near-patient blood glucose measurement.
    Rumley AG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1997 May; 34 ( Pt 3)():281-6. PubMed ID: 9158826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative accuracy of a point-of-care glucose meter compared with simultaneous central laboratory measurements.
    Mraovic B; Schwenk ES; Epstein RH
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 22768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two site evaluation of the performance of a new generation point-of-care glucose meter for use in a neonatal intensive care unit.
    Tendl KA; Christoph J; Bohn A; Herkner KR; Pollak A; Prusa AR
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1747-54. PubMed ID: 23612555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method precision and frequent causes of errors observed in point-of-care glucose testing: a proficiency testing program perspective.
    Aslan B; Stemp J; Yip P; Gun-Munro J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Dec; 142(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 25389340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.