These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24126198)

  • 1. Comparing methods to secure external fetal-monitoring devices.
    Panelli D; Teplick F; McCarthy M; Hebert S
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2014; 39(1):41-7; quiz 48-9. PubMed ID: 24126198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical characteristics of current cardiotocographic monitors.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Nogueira-Reis Z
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():22-32. PubMed ID: 26206513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ashwal E; Shinar S; Aviram A; Orbach S; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 29096560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.
    Monson M; Heuser C; Einerson BD; Esplin I; Snow G; Varner M; Esplin MS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):244.e1-244.e12. PubMed ID: 32087146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour.
    Cheyne H; Dunlop A; Shields N; Mathers AM
    Midwifery; 2003 Sep; 19(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 12946338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wearable Fetal Monitoring Solution for Improved Mobility During Labor & Delivery.
    Nguyen K; Bamgbose E; Cox BP; Huang SP; Mierzwa A; Hutchins S; Caso B; Culjat M; Connelly C; Lacoursiere DY; Singh RS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4397-4400. PubMed ID: 30441327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
    Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Kurse J
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical analysis of continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for preterm small for gestational age during labor].
    Guo XH; Su FM; Zhang HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 40(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 15840290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of STAN S21 fetal heart monitor by medical staff.
    Rault S; Vayssiere C; Roth E; David E; Favre R; Langer B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 102(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18378238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography between physicians and artificial intelligence-based technique using modified one-dimensional fully convolutional networks.
    Liu LC; Tsai YH; Chou YC; Jheng YC; Lin CK; Lyu NY; Chien Y; Yang YP; Chang KJ; Chang KH; Lee YL; Wang PH; Chu TW; Chang CC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2021 Feb; 84(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 32858548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis: a content analysis.
    Torres J; De Vries R; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014; 28(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 24781772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Nageotte MP
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 20(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 25769203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.