These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24127889)

  • 1. Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: what can they tell us about eyewitness memory?
    Horry R; Halford P; Brewer N; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):94-108. PubMed ID: 24127889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regularities in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
    Clark SE; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis.
    Behrman BW; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.
    Yang Y; Smith AM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.
    Charman SD; Quiroz V
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 27227276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit.
    Smalarz L; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 24707912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.
    Gronlund SD; Carlson CA; Dailey SB; Goodsell CA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.