These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24127905)

  • 1. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection.
    Özat PB; Tuncel İ; Eroğlu E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 24127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Lagouvardos PE; Fougia AG; Diamantopoulou SA; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 19105990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colour compatibility between teeth and dental shade guides in Quinquagenarians and Septuagenarians.
    Cocking C; Cevirgen E; Helling S; Oswald M; Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Reinelt G; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):848-55. PubMed ID: 19793231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.