324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24128010)
1. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.
Rouanne M; Rode J; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 23883410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control.
Hu JC; Gandaglia G; Karakiewicz PI; Nguyen PL; Trinh QD; Shih YC; Abdollah F; Chamie K; Wright JL; Ganz PA; Sun M
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 24602934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet 1995-2011 - an analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Røder MA
Dan Med J; 2013 Dec; 60(12):B4752. PubMed ID: 24355454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.
Barré C; Thoulouzan M; Aillet G; Nguyen JM
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):522-31. PubMed ID: 24112703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.
Stephenson AJ; Eggener SE; Hernandez AV; Klein EA; Kattan MW; Wood DP; Rabah DM; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
Eur Urol; 2014 Apr; 65(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 24035631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
