These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24128280)

  • 1. Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes.
    de Cara MÁ; Villanueva B; Toro MÁ; Fernández J
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(24):6091-9. PubMed ID: 24128280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations.
    Bosse M; Megens HJ; Madsen O; Crooijmans RP; Ryder OA; Austerlitz F; Groenen MA; de Cara MA
    Genome Res; 2015 Jul; 25(7):970-81. PubMed ID: 26063737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.
    de Cara MÁ; Villanueva B; Toro MÁ; Fernández J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Jun; 110(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 23321706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs.
    Saura M; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández J; Toro MA; Caballero A
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18680505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes.
    de Cara MA; Fernández J; Toro MA; Villanueva B
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22059579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Fernández J; Woolliams JA; Pong-Wong R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():2. PubMed ID: 26763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; de Cara MA; Fernández J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):38. PubMed ID: 24088414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of coancestry based on shared segments for maintaining genetic diversity.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Sölkner J; de Cara MA; Mészáros G; Pérez O'Brien AM; Fernández J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 26991632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impacts of early viability selection on management of inbreeding and genetic diversity in conservation.
    Grueber CE; Hogg CJ; Ivy JA; Belov K
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(8):1645-53. PubMed ID: 25735639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and management of gene and allelic diversity in subdivided populations using the software program METAPOP.
    Pérez-Figueroa A; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Caballero A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():261-75. PubMed ID: 22665286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in Allele Frequencies When Different Genomic Coancestry Matrices Are Used for Maintaining Genetic Diversity.
    Morales-González E; Fernández J; Pong-Wong R; Toro MÁ; Villanueva B
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 33947136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The concept of effective population size loses its meaning in the context of optimal management of diversity using molecular markers.
    Toro MA; Villanueva B; Fernández J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Jul; 137(4):345-355. PubMed ID: 31713272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; García-Cortés LA; de Cara MÁ
    Front Genet; 2015; 6():127. PubMed ID: 25904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximization of total genetic variance in breed conservation programmes.
    Cervantes I; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 22059580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of conservation management methods for subdivided populations under local adaptation.
    Sánchez-Molano E; Caballero A; Fernández J
    J Hered; 2013; 104(4):554-64. PubMed ID: 23526788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Founder effects, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity in four avian reintroduction programs.
    Jamieson IG
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20825445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of subdivided populations in conservation programs: development of a novel dynamic system.
    Fernández J; Toro MA; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):683-92. PubMed ID: 18493080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.
    Saura M; Fernández A; Rodríguez MC; Toro MA; Barragán C; Fernández AI; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78314. PubMed ID: 24205195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered Attwater's Prairie-chicken.
    Hammerly SC; Morrow ME; Johnson JA
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(21):5313-28. PubMed ID: 24118220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.