These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24129813)

  • 21. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation - testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision making.
    Bayne SC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 34(12):921-32. PubMed ID: 18034674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical studies in restorative dentistry: Design, conduct, analysis.
    Schwendicke F; Opdam N
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 28988780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
    Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in health over time in patients with symptoms allegedly caused by their dental restorative materials.
    Tillberg A; Berglund A; Mårell L; Bergdahl J; Eriksson N; Lindén G; Stenberg B; Widman L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 16262610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options.
    Culp L; McLaren EA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31(9):716-20, 722, 724-5. PubMed ID: 21197940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Plaque formation and marginal gingivitis associated with restorative materials.
    Litonjua LA; Cabanilla LL; Abbott LJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Jan; 33(1):e6-10. PubMed ID: 23268568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ideal restorative: does it exist?
    Hornbrook DS
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Dec; 129(12):1304-8. PubMed ID: 23431911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    Int Dent J; 1996 Jun; 46(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 8886864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of the Nd:YAP laser on coronal restorative materials: implications for endodontic retreatment.
    Blum JY; Peli JF; Abadie MJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11199799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of the ART approach in South Africa: an activity report.
    Mickenautsch S; Rudolph MJ
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):327-9. PubMed ID: 11575117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture.
    Ichim IP; Schmidlin PR; Li Q; Kieser JA; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 17391747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with experiences of health problems related to dental restorative materials.
    Naimi-Akbar A; Svedberg P; Alexanderson K; Carlstedt-Duke B; Ekstrand J; Englund GS
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 41(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 22963525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.