183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24129928)
21. [Quality of case allocation of orthopedics and trauma surgery in the 2004 and 2014 versions of the German DRG system. An interim assessment of the development process].
Franz D; Schemmann F; Selter DD; Auhuber T; Gehweiler D; Roeder N; Siebert H; Mahlke L
Unfallchirurg; 2014 Oct; 117(10):946-56. PubMed ID: 25274391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient classification and hospital costs of care for acute myocardial infarction in nine European countries.
Häkkinen U; Chiarello P; Cots F; Peltola M; Rättö H;
Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():19-29. PubMed ID: 22815109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The possible impact of the German DRGs reimbursement system on end-of-life decision making in a surgical intensive care unit.
Stachura P; Oberender P; Bundscherer AC; Wiese CH
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2015 Feb; 127(3-4):109-15. PubMed ID: 25622109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [OR minute myth : Guidelines for calculation of DRG revenues per OR minute].
Waeschle RM; Hinz J; Bleeker F; Sliwa B; Popov A; Schmidt CE; Bauer M
Anaesthesist; 2016 Feb; 65(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 26829952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Inpatient therapy of urinary stones in Germany: development of the G-DRG system].
Bauer J; Kahlmeyer A; Stredele R; Volkmer BG
Urologe A; 2014 Dec; 53(12):1764-71. PubMed ID: 25412912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Suggestions for implementation of DRG in the fields of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery for 2004].
Roeder N; Franz D; Siebert H; Frank D; Stücker R; Meiners T; Tempka A; Siebert CH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12928992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Definition of polytrauma in the German DRG system 2006. Up to 30% "incorrect classifications"].
Flohé S; Buschmann C; Nabring J; Merguet P; Luetkes P; Lefering R; Nast-Kolb D; Ruchholtz S
Unfallchirurg; 2007 Jul; 110(7):651-8. PubMed ID: 17618411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Inpatient treatment costs of skin diseases. Diagnosis-based cost calculation in a university dermatology clinic].
Richert L; Weber R; Doelfs P; Tscheulin D; Augustin M
Hautarzt; 2004 Nov; 55(11):1047-51. PubMed ID: 15448929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnosis-related groups as an instrument to develop suitable case-based lump sums in hematology and oncology].
Thalheimer M
Onkologie; 2011; 34 Suppl 1():11-5. PubMed ID: 21389763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The quality of patient care under the German DRG system using as example the inguinal hernia repair].
Rudroff C; Schweins M; Heiss MM
Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Feb; 133(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18278703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The challenge of adequate reimbursement for the seriously injured patient in the German DRG system].
Franz D; Lefering R; Siebert H; Windolf J; Roeder N; Mahlke L
Gesundheitswesen; 2013 Feb; 75(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 22491992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Severity of illness within DRGs: impact on prospective payment.
Horn SD; Sharkey PD; Chambers AF; Horn RA
Am J Public Health; 1985 Oct; 75(10):1195-9. PubMed ID: 3929632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How well do diagnosis-related group systems group breast cancer surgery patients? Evidence from 10 European countries.
Scheller-Kreinsen D;
Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():41-54. PubMed ID: 22815111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of 10 European DRG systems in explaining variation in resource utilisation in inguinal hernia repair.
O'Reilly J; Serdén L; Talbäck M; McCarthy B;
Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():89-101. PubMed ID: 22815115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DRG-based per diem payment system matches costs more accurately.
Brannen TJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Apr; 53(4):42-6. PubMed ID: 10557978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One DRG, one price? The effect of patient condition on price variation within DRGs and across hospitals.
Lynk WJ
Int J Health Care Finance Econ; 2001 Jun; 1(2):111-37. PubMed ID: 14625922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnosis related group costs in a regulated environment. A note about their economic interpretation.
Le Pen C; Berdeaux G
Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Feb; 17(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10947335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. DRGs in Europe: a cross country analysis for cholecystectomy.
Paat-Ahi G; Swiderek M; Sakowski P; Saluse J; Aaviksoo A;
Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():66-76. PubMed ID: 22815113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A new clinical complexity model for the Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups.
Dimitropoulos V; Yeend T; Zhou Q; McAlister S; Navakatikyan M; Hoyle P; Pilla J; Loggie C; Elsworthy A; Marshall R; Madden R
Health Policy; 2019 Nov; 123(11):1049-1052. PubMed ID: 31506190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How well do diagnosis-related groups for appendectomy explain variations in resource use? An analysis of patient-level data from 10 European countries.
Mason A; Or Z; Renaud T; Street A; Thuilliez J; Ward P;
Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():30-40. PubMed ID: 22815110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
