These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24129983)

  • 1. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Nobrega AS; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):106009. PubMed ID: 24129983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses, part II: photoelastic imaging.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; da Silva EV; Haddad MF; Moreno A; Zahoui A; dos Santos DM
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jun; 19(6):066012. PubMed ID: 24972360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
    do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photoelastic analysis to compare implant-retained and conventional obturator dentures.
    Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Moreno A
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jun; 17(6):061203. PubMed ID: 22734733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):061203. PubMed ID: 23143194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
    do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A photoelastic and strain gauge comparison of two attachments for obturator prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Matheus HR; de Medeiros RA; Dos Santos DM; Bitencourt SB; Pesqueira AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):685-689. PubMed ID: 27881311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.
    Wang Q; Zhang ZZ; Bai SZ; Zhang SF
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):469. PubMed ID: 36335327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic stress analysis in mandibular bone surrounding bar-clip overdenture implants.
    Pigozzo MN; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Souza GF; Ichi AL
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 24878673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tilted orthodontic micro implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Çehreli S; Özçırpıcı AA; Yılmaz A
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 21745828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator.
    Villefort RF; Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Borges AL; Binda NC; Ferreira CEA; Bottino MA; von Zeidler SLV
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241589. PubMed ID: 33125441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis.
    Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Garcia Júnior IR; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 19381103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla.
    Cidade CP; Pimentel MJ; Amaral RC; Nóbilo MA; Barbosa JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25229789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.