BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24130202)

  • 1. Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials.
    Kirkwood AA; Cox T; Hackshaw A
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):783-806. PubMed ID: 24130202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central site monitoring: results from a test of accuracy in identifying trials and sites failing Food and Drug Administration inspection.
    Lindblad AS; Manukyan Z; Purohit-Sheth T; Gensler G; Okwesili P; Meeker-O'Connell A; Ball L; Marler JR
    Clin Trials; 2014 Apr; 11(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 24296321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials.
    Pogue JM; Devereaux PJ; Thorlund K; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 23283577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistical approach to central monitoring of data quality in clinical trials.
    Venet D; Doffagne E; Burzykowski T; Beckers F; Tellier Y; Genevois-Marlin E; Becker U; Bee V; Wilson V; Legrand C; Buyse M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):705-13. PubMed ID: 22684241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR; Pittet JF
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 28786843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New ways of insulin delivery.
    Heinemann L
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2011 Feb; (170):31-46. PubMed ID: 21323811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoid lost discoveries, because of violations of standard assumptions, by using modern robust statistical methods.
    Wilcox R; Carlson M; Azen S; Clark F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 23195918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials.
    Al-Marzouki S; Evans S; Marshall T; Roberts I
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):267-70. PubMed ID: 16052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
    Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remote preenrollment checking of consent forms to reduce nonconformity.
    Journot V; Pérusat-Villetorte S; Bouyssou C; Couffin-Cadiergues S; Tall A; Chêne G;
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 23529696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud.
    van den Bor RM; Vaessen PWJ; Oosterman BJ; Zuithoff NPA; Grobbee DE; Roes KCB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():59-69. PubMed ID: 28412468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trials: robust tests are wonderful for imperfect data.
    Cleophas TJ
    Am J Ther; 2015; 22(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 23896742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a checklist of quality indicators for clinical trials in resource-limited countries: the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS) experience.
    Hanna M; Minga A; Fao P; Borand L; Diouf A; Mben JM; Gad RR; Anglaret X; Bazin B; Chene G;
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):300-18. PubMed ID: 23345311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrity of scientific data: transparency of clinical trial data.
    Moore N; Juillet Y; Bertoye PH;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(3):203-9, 211-6. PubMed ID: 17803887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central and statistical data monitoring in the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2) trial.
    Edwards P; Shakur H; Barnetson L; Prieto D; Evans S; Roberts I
    Clin Trials; 2014 Jun; 11(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 24346610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appendix to dialysis centre guidelines: recommendations for the relationship between outpatient haemodialysis centres and reference hospitals. Opinions from the Outpatient Dialysis Group. Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis Extrahospitalaria.
    Berdud I; Arenas MD; Bernat A; Ramos R; Blanco A;
    Nefrologia; 2011; 31(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 22130281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of clinical trial monitoring approaches on data integrity and cost--a review of current literature.
    Olsen R; Bihlet AR; Kalakou F; Andersen JR
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 72(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 26729259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.
    Buyse M; George SL; Evans S; Geller NL; Ranstam J; Scherrer B; Lesaffre E; Murray G; Edler L; Hutton J; Colton T; Lachenbruch P; Verma BL
    Stat Med; 1999 Dec; 18(24):3435-51. PubMed ID: 10611617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.