BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24130300)

  • 21. General practitioners in public obstetrics--an underutilized resource.
    Del Mar C; O'Connor V
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Feb; 34(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive.
    Rosemann T; Wensing M; Rueter G; Szecsenyi J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jan; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16423299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How do GPs in Switzerland perceive their patients' satisfaction and expectations? An observational study.
    Sebo P; Herrmann FR; Haller DM
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007085. PubMed ID: 26063565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.
    Vedam S; Stoll K; Martin K; Rubashkin N; Partridge S; Thordarson D; Jolicoeur G;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171804. PubMed ID: 28231285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.
    Warmelink JC; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Klomp T; Hutton EK
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():45-52. PubMed ID: 28926751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
    Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hospital utilization, efficiency and access to care during and shortly after restructuring acute care in Newfoundland and Labrador.
    Barrett B; Way C; McDonald J; Parfrey P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2005 Oct; 10 Suppl 2():S2:31-7. PubMed ID: 16259699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does the type of provider and the place of residence matter in the utilization of prenatal ultrasonography? Evidence from Canada.
    Guliani H; Sepehri A; Serieux J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):471-84. PubMed ID: 23912308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do the quality of health care services provided at personal health care institutions of Kaunas city and access to it meet expectations of pregnant women.
    Vanagiene V; Zilaitiene B; Vanagas T
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(8):652-9. PubMed ID: 19773625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utilization of prenatal care services in larger townships in Israel: should the service be reorganized?
    Palti H; Gofin R; Adler B
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Mar; 6(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 15055267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Demand and supply for psychological help in general practice in different European countries: access to primary mental health care in six European countries.
    Verhaak PF; van den Brink-Muinen A; Bensing JM; Gask L
    Eur J Public Health; 2004 Jun; 14(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 15230497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Booking for maternity care. A comparison of two systems.
    Klein M; Elbourne D; Lloyd I
    J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap; 1985 Apr; (31):1-17. PubMed ID: 2577943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Organisation of emergency transfer in maternity care in the Netherlands.
    Wiegers TA; de Borst J
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):973-80. PubMed ID: 23427853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability.
    Smith LF
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Mar; 10(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11239139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group.
    Khan-Neelofur D; Gülmezoglu M; Villar J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1998 Oct; 12 Suppl 2():7-26. PubMed ID: 9805721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of Interprofessional group antenatal care: a prospective comparative study.
    Hodgson ZG; Saxell L; Christians JK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):297. PubMed ID: 28882131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
    Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Municipal community obstetrics in a developing country.
    Frost O
    Trop Doct; 1980 Oct; 10(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7445060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How do Australian patients rate their general practitioner? A descriptive study using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire.
    Potiriadis M; Chondros P; Gilchrist G; Hegarty K; Blashki G; Gunn JM
    Med J Aust; 2008 Aug; 189(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 18707566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.