These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24131273)

  • 21. Perceptual load influences selective attention across development.
    Couperus JW
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1431-9. PubMed ID: 21688896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual load interacts with involuntary attention at early processing stages: event-related potential studies.
    Fu S; Huang Y; Luo Y; Wang Y; Fedota J; Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 19539769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
    Koshino H; Olid P
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual load is not always a crucial determinant of early versus late selection.
    Weissman DH; Drake B; Colella K; Samuel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():125-135. PubMed ID: 29454940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual reversals of Necker stimuli during intermittent presentation with limited attentional resources.
    Intaitė M; Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jan; 50(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 23215774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual load, voluntary attention, and aging: an event-related potential study.
    Wang Y; Fu S; Greenwood P; Luo Y; Parasuraman R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Apr; 84(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 22248536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High perceptual load makes everybody equal: eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 17576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual load modifies processing of unattended stimuli both in the presence and absence of attended stimuli.
    Couperus JW
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 20849914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.