These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24131363)

  • 1. You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):809-32. PubMed ID: 24131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stop task after-effects in schizophrenia: behavioral control adjustments and repetition priming.
    Enticott PG; Upton DJ; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Ogloff JR
    Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):405-14. PubMed ID: 22124369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do stimulus--action associations contribute to repetition priming?
    Dennis I; Perfect TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 22582963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excitatory and inhibitory priming by attended and ignored non-recycled words with monolinguals and bilinguals.
    Neumann E; Nkrumah IK; Chen Z
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1244-1255. PubMed ID: 29502469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic activation and letter search: blocking or suppression?
    Cinel C; Avons SE; Russo R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):580-94. PubMed ID: 19606403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive and negative priming differences between short-term and long-term identity coding of word-specific attentional priorities.
    McLennan KS; Neumann E; Russell PN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1426-1441. PubMed ID: 30644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1831-48. PubMed ID: 26076329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition priming in the stop signal task: the electrophysiology of sequential effects of stopping.
    Oldenburg JFE; Roger C; Assecondi S; Verbruggen F; Fias W
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Oct; 50(12):2860-2868. PubMed ID: 22940427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: evidence from simple and selective stopping.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychol Res; 2005 Mar; 69(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15750869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconscious task set priming with phonological and semantic tasks.
    Weibel S; Giersch A; Dehaene S; Huron C
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):517-27. PubMed ID: 23558083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.
    Dreisbach G; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21707220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.
    Palmer S; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 23528730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 18377179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
    Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features.
    Wendt M; Kluwe RH; Peters A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):644-67. PubMed ID: 16822130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength.
    Gibbons H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 21798292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.