These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24131607)

  • 21. Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise.
    Kolberg ER; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):51-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 25597460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sheft S; Cheng MY; Shafiro V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81. PubMed ID: 26134724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SoftVoice Improves Speech Recognition and Reduces Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Apperloo E; Koning R; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 32796352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remote Microphone Systems for Cochlear Implant Recipients in Small Group Settings.
    Miller S; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer EC; Galster J; Agrawal S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):142-148. PubMed ID: 36216041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
    McDermott H; Henshall K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device with the Advanced Bionics Naída CI Q90 sound processor.
    Ernst A; Baumgaertel RM; Diez A; Battmer RD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 30821202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Metselaar RM; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e232-e240. PubMed ID: 28125445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
    Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].
    Müller-Deile J; Kortmann T; Hoppe U; Hessel H; Morsnowski A
    HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18685820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.