These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24131607)

  • 41. Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors.
    Pinheiro MMC; Mancini PC; Soares AD; Ribas Â; Lima DP; Cavadas M; Banhara MR; Carvalho SADS; Buzo BC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jul; 32(7):469-476. PubMed ID: 34847587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(10):678-91. PubMed ID: 15646666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users.
    Fidêncio VLD; Jacob RTS; Tanamati LF; Bucuvic ÉC; Moret ALM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 29339025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
    Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Zhang F; Underwood G; McGuire K; Liang C; Moore DR; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():12-20. PubMed ID: 31035223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
    De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Wesarg T; Stelzig Y; Hilgert-Becker D; Kathage B; Wiebe K; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):246-256. PubMed ID: 31580804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer.
    Dorman MF; Natale S; Loiselle L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 29488870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Dawson PW; Hersbach AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):327-36. PubMed ID: 22280595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Subjective assessment of cochlear implant users' signal-to-noise ratio requirements for different levels of wireless device usability.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):952-68. PubMed ID: 25514448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
    Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.