106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24132404)
1. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs: a methodological error.
Sabour S; Dastjerdi EV
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):848. PubMed ID: 24132404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply: To PMID 21502380.
Erkan M
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 24132405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and accuracy of three different computerized cephalometric analysis software.
Rusu O; Petcu AE; Drăgan E; Haba D; Moscalu M; Zetu IN
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(1):248-56. PubMed ID: 25970975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of hand-tracing and cephalometric analysis computer programs with and without advanced features--accuracy and time demands.
Tsorovas G; Karsten AL
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 20554891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Kusnoto B
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of manual and computerized cephalometric analyses.
Dana JM; Goldstein M; Burch JG; Hardigan PC
J Clin Orthod; 2004 May; 38(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 15178884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.
Sommer T; Ciesielski R; Erbersdobler J; Orthuber W; Fischer-Brandies H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 19700534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points.
Duarte H; Vieck R; Siqueira DF; Angelieri F; Bommarito S; Dalben G; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 19700533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 16286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The validity of computerized orthognathic predictions.
Cousley RR; Grant E; Kindelan JD
J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 30(2):149-54; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 12835431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
