These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24133294)

  • 21. The effects of healthy aging on mental imagery as revealed by egocentric and allocentric mental spatial transformations.
    De Simone L; Tomasino B; Marusic N; Eleopra R; Rumiati RI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 23562849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contributions of optostatic and optokinetic cues to the perception of vertical.
    Niehof N; Perdreau F; Koppen M; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 31166820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frames of reference for biological motion and face perception.
    Chang DH; Harris LR; Troje NF
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):22. PubMed ID: 20884571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations.
    Lenggenhager B; Lopez C; Blanke O
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17717649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space.
    McIntyre J; Stratta F; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 78(3):1601-18. PubMed ID: 9310446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceived distance depends on the orientation of both the body and the visual environment.
    Harris LR; Mander C
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25319945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal reference frames for representation and storage of visual information: the role of gravity.
    McIntyre J; Lipshits M; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Gurfinkel V
    Acta Astronaut; 2001; 49(3-10):111-21. PubMed ID: 11669099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mental rotation of tactile stimuli: using directional haptic cues in mobile devices.
    Gleeson BT; Provancher WR
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 24808329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gravity influences the visual representation of object tilt in parietal cortex.
    Rosenberg A; Angelaki DE
    J Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 34(43):14170-80. PubMed ID: 25339732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetrical representation of body orientation.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Jenkin HL; Dyde RT; Jenkin MR; Harris LR
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):3. PubMed ID: 23378132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judging hand laterality from my or your point of view: interactions between motor imagery and visual perspective.
    Conson M; Mazzarella E; Donnarumma C; Trojano L
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Nov; 530(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23043889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. To pass or not to pass: more a question of body orientation than visual cues.
    Bourrelly A; Vercher JL; Bringoux L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1668-81. PubMed ID: 24224565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability.
    Tarnutzer AA; Bockisch C; Straumann D; Olasagasti I
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1657-71. PubMed ID: 19571203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mental rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations.
    Voyer D; Jansen P; Kaltner S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2319-2330. PubMed ID: 27603274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Updating of visual orientation in a gravity-based reference frame.
    Niehof N; Tramper JJ; Doeller CF; Medendorp WP
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):4. PubMed ID: 28983570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time course of allocentric decay, egocentric decay, and allocentric-to-egocentric conversion in memory-guided reach.
    Chen Y; Byrne P; Crawford JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 21056048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mental transformations of spatial stimuli in humans and in monkeys: rotation vs. translocation.
    Nekovarova T; Nedvidek J; Klement D; Rokyta R; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 240():182-91. PubMed ID: 23174207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.