384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24134332)
1. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions.
Guisan A; Tingley R; Baumgartner JB; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Sutcliffe PR; Tulloch AI; Regan TJ; Brotons L; McDonald-Madden E; Mantyka-Pringle C; Martin TG; Rhodes JR; Maggini R; Setterfield SA; Elith J; Schwartz MW; Wintle BA; Broennimann O; Austin M; Ferrier S; Kearney MR; Possingham HP; Buckley YM
Ecol Lett; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1424-35. PubMed ID: 24134332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Value of Information to improve conservation decision making.
Bolam FC; Grainger MJ; Mengersen KL; Stewart GB; Sutherland WJ; Runge MC; McGowan PJK
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Apr; 94(2):629-647. PubMed ID: 30280477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.
Tran J; Sellars M; Nolte L; White BP; Sinclair C; Fetherstonhaugh D; Detering K
Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):317-327. PubMed ID: 33472740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. INHABIT: A web-based decision support tool for invasive plant species habitat visualization and assessment across the contiguous United States.
Engelstad P; Jarnevich CS; Hogan T; Sofaer HR; Pearse IS; Sieracki JL; Frakes N; Sullivan J; Young NE; Prevéy JS; Belamaric P; LaRoe J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263056. PubMed ID: 35134065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.
Martin J; Runge MC; Nichols JD; Lubow BC; Kendall WL
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1079-90. PubMed ID: 19688917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.
Cook CN; Mascia MB; Schwartz MW; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):669-78. PubMed ID: 23574343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implicit decision framing as an unrecognized source of confusion in endangered species classification.
Cummings JW; Converse SJ; Smith DR; Morey S; Runge MC
Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1246-1254. PubMed ID: 29987850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of species distribution models in the prediction of marine potential habitat: A review].
Yang XL; Yang CJ; Hu CY; Zhang XM
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Jun; 28(6):2063-2072. PubMed ID: 29745172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.
Dicks LV; Walsh JC; Sutherland WJ
Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Nov; 29(11):607-13. PubMed ID: 25280588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):449-461. PubMed ID: 30350891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avian Conservation Areas as a Proxy for Contaminated Soil Remediation.
Lin WC; Lin YP; Anthony J; Ding TS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Jul; 12(7):8312-31. PubMed ID: 26193297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
Gregory R; Long G; Colligan M; Geiger JG; Laser M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 105():30-43. PubMed ID: 22516871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A typology of time-scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems.
Wilson RS; Hardisty DJ; Epanchin-Niell RS; Runge MC; Cottingham KL; Urban DL; Maguire LA; Hastings A; Mumby PJ; Peters DP
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 26390368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.
Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Freeman BD
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2014 Apr; 30(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24211047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Private land conservation decision-making: An integrative social science model.
Epanchin-Niell RS; Jackson-Smith DB; Wilson RS; Ashenfarb M; Dayer AA; Hillis V; Iacona GD; Markowitz EM; Marquart-Pyatt ST; Treakle T
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):113961. PubMed ID: 34700077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Translocation of imperiled species under changing climates.
Schwartz MW; Martin TG
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 May; 1286():15-28. PubMed ID: 23574620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining occurrence and abundance distribution models for the conservation of the Great Bustard.
Mi C; Huettmann F; Sun R; Guo Y
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4160. PubMed ID: 29255652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
